Distributed IoT Management via Asset Abstraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The management of IoT systems becomes increasingly complex due to the growing number and diversity of connected devices, requiring improved scalability, resiliency, and portability of applications, as well as efficient deployment and redeployment processes, which existing technologies struggle to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

A distributed IoT management framework utilizing asset abstraction and automated asset binding enables the creation of portable, reusable, and sharable IoT applications by treating devices as abstracted classes rather than specific entities, facilitating self-healing and self-optimization through machine learning and telemetry data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the number of connected devices is increased to expand IoT system capabilities, then the system's functionality and coverage are improved, but the management complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides device management into separate functional modules: device registration, configuration, monitoring, and control are handled by distinct management entities. This segmentation allows complex device fleets to be managed through modular, independent processes rather than monolithic management, reducing overall management complexity while supporting expanded functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized management platform acts as an intermediary between diverse IoT devices and users. This platform provides standardized interfaces and protocols, abstracting the complexity of device diversity from users while enabling expanded system capabilities through unified management of heterogeneous devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional device management approaches are used, then existing systems can be maintained, but scalability and resiliency are insufficient for large-scale IoT networks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem resiliencyVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring and feedback mechanisms that track device health, performance, and status. This enables automatic detection of failures and degradation, triggering resilient responses such as failover, resource reallocation, or alerting, thereby improving system reliability without proportionally increasing management complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring devices, pre-establishing communication protocols, and pre-planning failover mechanisms. This preparation enables rapid response to failures and scaling events, improving resiliency and scalability while reducing the complexity of reactive management through proactive design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If manual deployment and configuration processes are used, then detailed control is maintained, but deployment time and human intervention increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service deployment where devices automatically register with the management platform, configure themselves using templates, and establish connections without extensive manual intervention. This dramatically increases deployment speed while maintaining operational simplicity through automated workflows that handle complex configuration tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter templates and configuration profiles that can be dynamically changed to adapt deployment parameters to different device types and scenarios. This allows rapid deployment of diverse devices using standardized processes, improving productivity while maintaining ease of operation through parameterized rather than manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11652886B2Reusable device management in machine-to-machine systems
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 INTEL CORP
  • US11652886B2 patent drawing
  • US11652886B2 patent drawing
  • US11652886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Data is received describing a local model of a first device generated by the first device based on sensor readings at the first device and a global model is updated that is hosted remote from the first device based on the local model and modeling devices in a plurality of different asset taxonomies. A particular operating state affecting one or more of a set of devices deployed in a particular machine-to-machine network is detected and the particular machine-to-machine network is automatically reconfigured based on the global model.