IoT Pairing Controller Ambient Signal Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The lack of standardization in IoT device development and adoption is hindered by the need for developers to design for various network protocols, hardware, and software, leading to proprietary techniques that complicate the integration and functionality of IoT devices across different environments, such as those affected by ambient conditions like high-intensity sunlight.

Innovation Solution

An IoT pairing controller that allows end-users to configure pairs of IoT devices to toggle between different pairing signal types (light, sound, infrared, RF, etc.) based on detected ambient conditions, ensuring reliable operation by correlating signals and reporting client-defined statements on sensed or not sensed conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single pairing signal type is used for IoT devices, then the device design is simple, but the reliability of operation in diverse ambient conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of IoT device operationVSAvoidcomplexity of signal type configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between different pairing signal types (light, sound, infrared, RF) based on detected ambient conditions. The pairing controller automatically selects the appropriate signal type to maintain reliable operation in diverse environments, transforming a static single-signal approach into a dynamic multi-signal system that adapts to environmental factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of signal type selection based on ambient condition parameters. When ambient conditions change (e.g., high-intensity sunlight affecting light-based pairing), the system modifies the pairing signal type parameter to ensure reliable device pairing and operation, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If proprietary techniques are used for each IoT device provider, then device-specific optimization is achieved, but ease of operation and integration across different devices deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of integrating IoT devicesVSAvoidadaptability to different ambient conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The pairing controller is designed with universal functionality to support multiple pairing signal types (light, sound, infrared, RF). This multi-functional design allows a single device to operate effectively across diverse ambient conditions without requiring proprietary techniques for each provider, thereby improving ease of operation and integration while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The pairing controller acts as an intermediary that manages the selection and switching between different pairing signal types. This intermediary component standardizes the pairing process across different IoT devices, enabling seamless integration while adapting to various ambient conditions without requiring device-specific proprietary solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If ambient conditions are not considered in signal selection, then device operation is simple, but measurement precision and condition detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of condition sensingVSAvoidcomplexity of ambient condition monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring ambient conditions and using this information to adjust the pairing signal type selection. The pairing controller receives feedback from ambient condition sensors and automatically selects the appropriate signal type, thereby improving measurement precision and condition detection accuracy while managing complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11368536B2Configuring meaning and state conditions for paired IoT devices
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 T MOBILE US INC
  • US11368536B2 patent drawing
  • US11368536B2 patent drawing
  • US11368536B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes techniques that enable an Internet of Things (IoT) pairing Controller to determine whether a pairing condition between a first IoT device and a second IoT device is a “sensed” pairing condition or a “not sensed” pairing condition. For example, the IoT pairing controller may receive, from a client device, a pairing request associated with a first IoT device and a second IoT device. The IoT pairing controller may generate pairing data for delivery to at least the first IoT device, and in doing so, determine the pairing condition. A notification may be generated for delivery to the client device indicating the pairing condition.