IoT Peer Device State Management for Passive Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for improved systems and methods to efficiently activate and read ambient or passive devices, such as IoT devices, which currently face challenges in energy harvesting and configuration management.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a first device that receives configuration information from a control unit, setting its state accordingly, and monitoring triggers to control changes in its state, allowing it to serve as a peer device in various states including activation, reading, and relay states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If devices use activation signals to activate ambient or passive devices, then energy harvesting is enabled for passive devices, but system complexity increases due to multiple device states and peer device management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy harvestingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments device functionality into distinct states (activation state, reading state, activation eligible state, reading eligible state) and assigns specialized peer devices to handle specific tasks. This segmentation allows passive devices to remain simple while active peer devices manage the complexity of activation and reading operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Peer devices act as intermediaries between the control unit and ambient/passive devices. They receive configuration information from the control unit, manage state transitions, and coordinate activation signals, thereby reducing the complexity burden on passive devices while enabling energy harvesting functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If peer devices are assigned specific states and durations for serving ambient devices, then device functionality is optimized, but adaptability decreases in dynamic and mobile environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic state management where peer devices can transition between different states (activation, reading, activation eligible, reading eligible) based on monitored triggers. Configuration information includes duration parameters that allow automatic state expiration and reconfiguration, enabling the system to adapt to changing environmental conditions and device availability in mobile scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors triggers related to device state changes, mobility conditions, and peer device availability. Based on this feedback, the control unit can reconfigure peer devices with updated duration parameters and state assignments, allowing the system to maintain optimized functionality while adapting to dynamic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If multiple triggers are monitored for state changes, then system responsiveness is improved, but processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem responsivenessVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Different peer devices monitor different subsets of triggers based on their current state and assigned responsibilities. For example, devices in activation state monitor triggers related to activation signals, while devices in reading state monitor triggers related to data transmission. This localized monitoring reduces overall processing overhead while maintaining system responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Peer devices autonomously evaluate monitored triggers against their current state and configuration parameters to determine when state changes are appropriate. This self-service approach eliminates the need for constant control unit intervention, reducing processing overhead while maintaining responsive state transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250080202A1Device activation
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20250080202A1 patent drawing
  • US20250080202A1 patent drawing
  • US20250080202A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and computer program are described comprising: receiving, at a first device, configuration information from a control unit, wherein the configuration information comprises a configured state of the first device and a duration for serving as one of a plurality of peer devices; setting the state of the first device to the configured state in response to reception of configuration information from said control unit; monitoring one or more triggers; controlling a change in the state of the first device in response to activation of one or more monitored triggers; and communicating any change of state of the first device to one or more of said peer devices.