Heterogeneous IoT Device Communication via Relay Path Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack an efficient method to coordinate, control, and monitor the vast number of heterogeneous devices connected via different network types in the Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem, which complicates direct device-to-device communication and resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a web portal that maintains connectivity reports across various networks, allowing devices to determine optimal communication paths by broadcasting and updating status information, including bandwidth and relay capabilities, to establish efficient communication links between devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If devices communicate directly via carrier networks, then communication reliability is improved, but energy consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediary devices (relays) that forward communications between devices. Instead of direct carrier network communication, messages are routed through intermediate nodes that are in proximity, enabling low-power PAN communications while maintaining connectivity through multi-hop routing. The relay devices maintain connectivity reports and facilitate path selection to ensure reliable delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The communication path is segmented into multiple hops through relay devices rather than a single direct connection. This allows the system to break down long-distance or high-cost carrier network paths into shorter, lower-power segments using PAN technology, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining communication reliability through intermediate forwarding nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If more network paths are available for device communication, then communication flexibility is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Devices autonomously discover available network paths and relay nodes through broadcasting connectivity information. The system self-organizes by having devices independently determine optimal communication routes based on local connectivity reports, eliminating the need for complex centralized path management while maintaining flexibility in route selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Connectivity reports are pre-established and maintained by relay devices before actual communication occurs. Devices broadcast and update their network status, available relays, and path information in advance, enabling receiving devices to make informed routing decisions without real-time complexity. This preliminary path preparation simplifies on-demand communication selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If devices broadcast connectivity information frequently, then network path accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork path accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Devices broadcast connectivity information periodically rather than continuously or on every state change. This periodic broadcasting maintains adequate knowledge of network paths and relay availability while significantly reducing transmission frequency and associated energy consumption. The period is tuned to balance path accuracy with power savings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Use of energy by moving object

If relay devices are used for communication, then energy cost is reduced, but communication latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy costVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects communication paths based on current network conditions, message priority, and latency requirements. For time-sensitive communications, devices can choose direct carrier network paths despite higher energy cost. For non-urgent traffic, low-power relay paths are selected. This dynamic path selection optimizes the trade-off between energy consumption and latency based on application needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2754318B1Method and apparatuses for wireless communication among disparate devices
Publication Date: 2019.09.25 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP2754318B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2754318B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2754318B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and device for managing communications between a plurality of heterogeneous devices are disclosed. In one embodiment, a connectivity report is used to determine which network type to use to establish a connection. The connectivity report is prepared by a web portal and broadcast to each device connected to at least one of the network types.