IoT Replica Voting for FDI-Resistant Communication Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cyber-physical systems (CPS) in electric vehicle charging infrastructure are vulnerable to sophisticated cyber-attacks, particularly false data injection (FDI) attacks, which disrupt frequency regulation and degrade system performance, and current defense strategies are costly, complex, or degrade system performance.

Innovation Solution

Implement a decentralized Moving Target Defense (MTD) framework with two additional layers: Random Replica Activation (RRA) and Majority Vote Input (MVI) to enhance security, using IoT devices to replicate and randomly activate subsets of data transmission, ensuring secure communication without degrading system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If decentralized MTD framework with RRA and MVI layers is implemented, then security against FDI attacks is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against FDI attacksVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the IoT device functionality into multiple independent replicas, each capable of receiving and processing data separately. This segmentation allows the system to distribute the security burden across multiple instances while maintaining individual simplicity, resolving the contradiction between enhanced security and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple copies (replicas) of the IoT device that perform identical functions. These replicas receive data through the same communication channel and independently process it. The copying approach enhances security through diversity while keeping each individual replica simple, addressing the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If multiple replicated data transmissions are performed, then security through uncertainty is improved, but communication overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity through uncertaintyVSAvoidcommunication overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic activation of replicas rather than continuous operation of all replicas. At each time step, only a subset of replicas is activated to transmit data, creating uncertainty for attackers while limiting the total communication overhead. This periodic action resolves the contradiction between security and communication burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of activating all replicas continuously, the system uses partial action by activating only a subset of replicas at each time step. This approach provides sufficient security through uncertainty while avoiding the excessive communication overhead that would result from full replica activation, thus resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If random replica activation is implemented, then attacker reconnaissance is limited, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattacker reconnaissance capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic activation of replicas based on random selection at each time step. This dynamic behavior prevents attackers from predicting which replicas will be active, limiting reconnaissance capability. The dynamic approach achieves security goals while maintaining relatively simple individual replica structures, resolving the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If majority vote input mechanism is used, then FDI attack impact is reduced, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFDI attack impact resistanceVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The majority vote mechanism implements a feedback loop where replica outputs are compared and the majority result is selected as the final output. This feedback approach effectively reduces FDI attack impact by rejecting minority (potentially attacked) outputs while maintaining relatively simple processing logic at each replica, resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12464017B2Security systems, methods, storage medium for increasing security of devices utilizing a communication channel
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US12464017B2 patent drawing
  • US12464017B2 patent drawing
  • US12464017B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A security system for enhancing security of a device utilizing a communication channel includes one or more processors and a storage including instructions stored thereon. When the instructions are executed by the one or more processors, the instructions cause the security system to receive, by a plurality of Internet of Thing (IoT) devices, data from a communication source through a first communication channel, replicate, by the plurality of IoT devices, the received data, randomly activate one of non-empty subsets of the plurality of IoT devices, select a majority vote input based on the replicated data from the randomly activated subset of the plurality of IoT devices; and transmit the majority vote input to a communication destination through a second communication channel, which is different from the first communication channel.