IoT Sensor Function Migration for Attack Resilience

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Internet of Things (IoT) devices are vulnerable to attacks due to their limited processing power and low cost, making them susceptible to malicious hacks and failures, which can lead to significant losses and disruptions in critical functionalities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a sensor device managing module that monitors core functions for anomalies, migrates sensor functions to neighboring devices in case of anomalies, and uses memory isolation to prevent malicious attacks, ensuring continuous functionality and resilience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If sensor devices are made low cost with limited processing power, then ease of manufacture and deployment are improved, but vulnerability to attacks and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the sensor function from the physical device. When a device is compromised, only the software code needs to be migrated to another device, not the entire system. This segmentation allows low-cost devices to be used while maintaining reliability through software-based redundancy and migration capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing a network of neighboring sensor devices that can serve as backup hosts. When an anomaly is detected, the software code can be quickly migrated to a pre-identified neighboring device, preventing service interruption without requiring immediate device replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If sensor devices have limited processing power, then cost is reduced, but ability to detect and respond to attacks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoiddifficulty of detecting and measuring
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the detection and response capabilities across multiple neighboring sensor devices. Individual devices with limited processing power contribute to a collective security system where anomalies detected by one device can trigger coordinated responses from neighboring devices, compensating for individual limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism where neighboring sensor devices act as mediators for security monitoring and response. When one device detects an anomaly, neighboring devices serve as intermediaries to host the migrated software code and maintain service continuity, distributing the detection and response burden across the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If sensor functions are migrated to neighboring devices, then continuity of service is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuity of serviceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses copying by creating a software code copy of the sensor function that can be transferred to neighboring devices. This copying approach maintains service continuity without requiring complex reconfiguration or modification of the underlying hardware, as the software image can be replicated and executed on alternative devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic functionality where the sensor function can move between devices based on operational needs and security conditions. The software code is designed to be portable and adaptable, allowing it to dynamically relocate to neighboring devices when anomalies are detected, maintaining service continuity through flexible, runtime reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240202324A1Sensor device protection against attack
Publication Date: 2024.06.20 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US20240202324A1 patent drawing
  • US20240202324A1 patent drawing
  • US20240202324A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A processing system including at least one processor may monitoring a performance of at least one sensor function of the first sensor device, detect an anomaly in the performance of the at least one sensor function, send a request to at least one neighboring sensor device to host the at least one sensor function of the first sensor device, receive an acceptance to the request from the at least one neighboring sensor device to host the at least one sensor function of the first sensor device and transfer a software code of the at least one sensor function to the at least one neighboring sensor device.