IoT Sensor Network Validation via Real-Time Signal Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for deploying IoT sensors lack accuracy in determining optimal locations for predictable connectivity, leading to high operational costs and truck rolls due to statistical modeling variabilities and differences in RF characteristics among low-cost IoT modules.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an API/mobile platform, hardware kit/dongle, communication network, server, and network modules that measures signal strength in real-time to determine optimal IoT sensor deployment locations based on network intelligence, using a cloud-based Geographic Information System (GIS) and analytics engine for data processing and visualization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If statistical modeling using terrain and clutter models is used for sensor deployment, then deployment coverage can be estimated, but measurement precision and reliability of connectivity prediction deteriorate due to statistical variabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnectivity prediction reliabilityVSAvoidsignal strength measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses actual IoT sensor devices to copy and replicate real-world measurement conditions. Instead of relying on statistical models, the system deploys multiple identical or similar IoT sensors at candidate locations to directly measure and report actual signal strength, replacing theoretical modeling with empirical data collection from representative devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where IoT sensors continuously measure and report actual signal strength to a server. The server processes this feedback data to identify optimal locations, then validates predictions by having sensors at those locations perform measurements. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables continuous refinement of location recommendations based on actual measured performance rather than statistical estimates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If low cost IoT modules are used to reduce device cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but measurement precision deteriorates due to differences in RF characteristics among modules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice manufacturing costVSAvoidsignal strength measurement consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Each low-cost IoT module performs its own self-measurement of signal strength at its deployment location and automatically reports results to the server. The system leverages the inherent capabilities of each individual module to measure its own operating conditions, eliminating the need for centralized calibration or high-precision reference equipment. This self-service approach allows heterogeneous low-cost modules to contribute valid measurement data despite manufacturing variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the measurement parameter from requiring absolute precision to measuring relative signal strength thresholds. Instead of demanding highly precise and consistent RF characteristics across all modules, the system determines optimal locations based on whether signal strength exceeds minimum thresholds for reliable connectivity. This parameter transformation allows use of low-cost modules with varying RF characteristics while still achieving accurate location optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If traditional RF scanning tools are used for network measurement, then measurement capability is available, but device complexity and cost increase due to bulky equipment requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork signal measurement capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex professional RF scanning equipment with copies of actual IoT sensor devices. These simplified devices replicate the essential measurement function by using the same network modules and antennas that will be deployed in production. This copying approach eliminates the need for bulky, expensive measurement tools while maintaining measurement relevance to actual operational conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The IoT devices themselves perform the measurement function they were originally designed for - communicating with the network. By leveraging their built-in network capabilities, the devices automatically measure signal strength as a byproduct of their normal operation. This self-service measurement eliminates the need for separate, complex measurement equipment while using the devices' inherent communication capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11751069B2System and method for identification, selection and validation of best network access for IoT devices
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 NIVID TECH
  • US11751069B2 patent drawing
  • US11751069B2 patent drawing
  • US11751069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates cloud based IoT network monitoring and validation to enable optimal network selection and connectivity for IoT sensors. The present invention relates to a system to measure the signal quality directly from the network module of IoT sensors. It comprises of an application programming interface (API) 105, a Network detection dongle 103, communication network 110, server 115, network modules of network operators and IoT sensors 120, to be deployed or installed. The invention also relates to a method for determination of signal strength from network module of IoT sensors, wherein the API 105 is configured to run network detection software to determine and validate an optimal location for IoT sensor/device installation or deployment based on the highest signal strength.