IoT Sensor Peer Interrogation for Data Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

IoT sensor systems face challenges in maintaining data reliability due to sensor degradation and single-point failures, leading to inaccurate data transmission, which can result in false alarms and decision errors, and existing solutions like recalibration or deploying large numbers of sensors increase network traffic and costs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a peer sensor interrogation technique where secondary sensors validate data from primary sensors, providing supplemental data to enhance reliability and mitigate single-point failures, optimizing sensor density and network traffic.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If peer sensor interrogation is implemented for data validation, then data reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a peer sensor as an intermediary device that validates data from the primary sensor. The peer sensor acts as a mediator by comparing its own measurements with those of the primary sensor, thereby improving data reliability without requiring complex validation logic in the primary sensor itself. This resolves the contradiction by externalizing the validation function to a dedicated peer device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the sensing function into two distinct roles: primary sensor for data collection and peer sensor for validation. This segmentation allows each sensor to be optimized for its specific function, with the primary sensor focusing on measurement and the peer sensor focusing on verification, thereby improving overall reliability while keeping individual device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If multiple sensors are deployed for validation, then data reliability is improved, but network traffic increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The peer sensor interrogation is performed periodically rather than continuously. The system selectively activates the peer sensor to validate primary sensor data at specific intervals or when anomalies are detected, rather than maintaining constant communication. This periodic validation approach improves data reliability while significantly reducing network traffic and energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The peer sensor performs self-service validation by autonomously comparing its measurements with the primary sensor data and determining validation outcomes. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for centralized validation logic and minimizes network communication overhead, as the peer sensor independently assesses data reliability without requiring extensive network traffic for coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If sensor recalibration is performed frequently, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The peer sensor serves as a preliminary validation mechanism that checks primary sensor data before it is fully processed or acted upon. By performing this preliminary validation, the system can identify potential calibration issues early without requiring frequent full recalibration cycles, thereby maintaining measurement precision while reducing the time lost to recalibration activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The peer sensor provides continuous feedback on the accuracy and reliability of primary sensor measurements. This feedback mechanism allows the system to detect drift or calibration issues in real-time and trigger targeted recalibration only when necessary, rather than performing frequent preventive recalibration. This reduces measurement precision degradation while minimizing the time lost to recalibration operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10810061B2System and methods of enhanced data reliability of internet of things sensors to perform critical decisions using peer sensor interrogation
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10810061B2 patent drawing
  • US10810061B2 patent drawing
  • US10810061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for enhanced data reliability for sensor devices, such as Internet of Things (IoT) sensors can include a first set of sensor devices (e.g., primary sensors) for collecting data in accordance with an application program. A second set of sensor devices (peer sensors) can be enabled for collecting supplemental data. Each of the sensor devices in the second set of sensor devices corresponds to one of the sensor devices in the first set of sensor devices. After receiving data from a selected sensor device of the set of first sensor devices and determining that the received data triggers a notification for a critical event, a second sensor of the second set of sensor devices can be interrogated to confirm the critical event. The event is confirmed by a convergence of data from the selected sensor device and the supplemental data from the second sensor device.