IoT Sensor Vehicle Valuation via Predictive Failure Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle value estimation tools fail to account for undisclosed issues such as improper maintenance, use of inauthentic parts, and aggressive driving history, leading to post-purchase maintenance costs, lifespan, and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using IoT sensors and machine learning models to assess vehicle safety and value by predicting part failures, estimating repair costs, and determining a real-time market value based on the condition and authenticity of parts, providing a dynamic and transparent assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional vehicle valuation methods are used, then the valuation process is simple and quick, but the accuracy and reliability of the valuation is compromised due to undisclosed issues like improper maintenance, inauthentic parts, and aggressive driving history

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle valuation accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively monitoring vehicle conditions through IoT sensors before failures occur, tracking maintenance history, detecting inauthentic parts, and identifying aggressive driving patterns. This advance detection and assessment enables accurate valuation by revealing hidden issues that traditional methods miss, resolving the contradiction between simple valuation processes and accurate measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If real-time IoT sensor data analysis is implemented, then vehicle safety and value assessment accuracy is improved, but the system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safety assessment reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex assessment task into distinct functional modules: IoT sensor data collection, maintenance history tracking, part authenticity verification, driving behavior analysis, and valuation calculation. Each module handles specific data types and processing requirements independently, then integrates results to provide comprehensive assessment. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability in safety and value assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of information

If comprehensive vehicle monitoring and assessment is performed, then the value transparency and informed decision-making is enhanced, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle condition information transparencyVSAvoidassessment processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring of vehicle conditions through IoT sensors, maintaining an ongoing record of vehicle health, maintenance events, part authenticity, and driving patterns. Rather than performing discrete assessments, the system continuously updates the vehicle's digital profile, ensuring information is always current and transparent. This continuous action eliminates information loss while providing timely valuation data without requiring intensive periodic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250095032A1Dynamic Vehicle Safety and Value Assessment Enabled by Real Time Network IoT Sensor Data Analysis
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250095032A1 patent drawing
  • US20250095032A1 patent drawing
  • US20250095032A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Dynamic vehicle assessment is provided. A baseline value of a vehicle is determined based on current market values of a set of vehicles similar to the vehicle with regard to similar year, make, model, and mileage. A percentage of deviation from the baseline value of the vehicle is determined based on a cost to repair a set of given parts of the vehicle predicted to fail within a defined time period. A real time actual market value of the vehicle is determined based on the percentage of deviation from the baseline value of the vehicle according to the cost to repair the set of given parts of the vehicle predicted to fail within the defined time period. The real time actual market value of the vehicle is sent to a requester via a network in response to receiving a request for an assessment of the vehicle.