IoT Software Management Framework with ML Security Predictions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

IoT devices pose significant security risks due to outdated security measures, vulnerabilities in TCP/IP stacks, and lack of regulation, which can lead to data breaches, device hijacking, and disruptions in critical infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive framework utilizing machine learning models to predict and manage potential security and performance issues in IoT devices by analyzing software components, OS, patches, and libraries, and providing proactive updates and configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If IoT devices use outdated security measures and basic code, then device complexity and ease of manufacture are maintained, but security vulnerabilities increase and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoidsecurity framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework performs preliminary security assessments and vulnerability predictions before deployment using machine learning models trained on historical security data. This allows potential security issues to be identified and addressed in advance, improving security reliability without requiring complex runtime security mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated self-diagnosis and self-protection mechanisms where IoT devices can independently identify vulnerabilities and apply security patches without manual intervention. The machine learning models enable devices to autonomously assess their security posture and take corrective actions, reducing the need for complex external security management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive security monitoring and machine learning models are implemented, then security and performance issue detection improves, but computational resources and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity issue detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The framework implements selective monitoring where machine learning models focus only on the most critical security parameters and performance metrics relevant to each specific IoT device type. Rather than analyzing all possible data points, the system identifies and monitors only the key indicators that provide the highest detection accuracy with minimal computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a lightweight intermediary layer that aggregates and pre-processes security data before feeding it to machine learning models. This intermediary component filters out noise and consolidates relevant information, enabling accurate security detection while significantly reducing the computational energy required by the main processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If proactive security updates and configurations are provided, then security vulnerabilities are reduced, but device management complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity vulnerability reductionVSAvoidupdate management time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The framework implements continuous feedback loops where security performance data from deployed devices is automatically collected, analyzed, and used to refine security models and generate updated protection strategies. This automated feedback mechanism enables proactive security updates to be generated and distributed without manual analysis, reducing the time required for vulnerability management while maintaining high security standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If machine learning models analyze software components and patches, then prediction accuracy for security issues improves, but data processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the analysis of software components into distinct modules, each specializing in analyzing specific types of security-relevant data such as code patterns, configuration files, or patch metadata. This segmentation allows machine learning models to focus on specific analysis tasks, improving prediction accuracy for each component type while reducing the overall computational complexity compared to a monolithic analysis system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250045416A1Iot/iomt software management framework with built-in performance and security/vulnerability alerts
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250045416A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045416A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045416A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method includes pre-processing a dataset, wherein the dataset includes data and/or metadata that indicates a software configuration of an internet of things (IoT) device, and/or indicates a history of any performance issues and/or security issues experienced by the IoT device, after the dataset is pre-processed, providing the dataset as an input to a machine learning model, using the machine learning model to generate, based on the input, respective target variable value predictions for each target variable in a group of target variables, and a first one of the target variables corresponds to the software configuration, and a second one of the target variables corresponds to the history, and when the target variable value predictions indicate a potential security issue and/or a potential performance issue, with the IoT device, taking a remedial action to resolve the potential security issue and/or the potential performance issue.