Automated Tag Mapping for Industrial IoT Analytics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current approaches for mapping tag names from industrial machines to analytics are time-consuming, costly, and prone to human error, especially in modern industrial settings with thousands of tags and varying naming conventions.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning techniques, text and asset analytics, and automated subject matter knowledge bases to normalize and compare tag names, creating similarity measures for automated mapping, facilitated by a computerized industrial internet of things analytics platform.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual mapping of tag names is performed, then mapping can be completed with simple tools, but the process becomes time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of mapping processVSAvoidtime for mapping process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of tag name mapping with an automated computer-based system that uses machine learning algorithms and natural language processing to automatically match equipment tag names with analytic tag names, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated mapping system as an intermediary between equipment tags and analytics, which uses normalized descriptions and similarity algorithms to bridge the gap between different naming conventions, thereby reducing both time and human error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If manual mapping of tag names is performed, then mapping can be done with basic tools, but human error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of mapping processVSAvoidaccuracy of mapping
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of tag name mapping with an automated computer-based system that uses machine learning algorithms and natural language processing to automatically match equipment tag names with analytic tag names, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the automated mapping results can be reviewed and refined, and where the system learns from corrections to improve future mapping accuracy, thereby continuously reducing human error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If automated mapping is implemented, then time and cost are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for mapping processVSAvoidcomplexity of mapping system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the automated mapping system into distinct functional modules including data normalization, similarity calculation, matching algorithms, and result validation, allowing each component to be developed and maintained independently while working together to solve the overall mapping problem

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If different naming conventions are used by different users, then individual preferences are accommodated, but mapping time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of naming conventionsVSAvoidtime for mapping process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms tag names from their original varied forms into a standardized normalized representation by adjusting parameters such as case, punctuation, and formatting, thereby preserving the semantic meaning while enabling automated comparison and matching across different naming conventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10460240B2Apparatus and method for tag mapping with industrial machines
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 GE DIGITAL HLDG LLC
  • US10460240B2 patent drawing
  • US10460240B2 patent drawing
  • US10460240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for associating equipment sensor tags with tags associated with analytic programs including embodiments that receive a list of equipment tag names and corresponding descriptions as well as a list of analytic tag names and descriptions. The equipment tag descriptions are normalized to create normalized equipment tag descriptions, and the analytic tag descriptions are normalized to create normalized analytic tag descriptions. A first matrix of vectors that associates content in a dictionary with aspects of the equipment tag names is created using corresponding normalized tag descriptions. A second matrix of vectors that associates the content in a dictionary with aspects of the normalized analytic tag description is created.