IoT Update Validation via Genetic Algorithm Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

IoT devices face challenges in maintenance and updates due to their large number, wide dispersion, and resource constraints, leading to potential operational risks and the need for efficient software and firmware updates, especially in remote and inaccessible areas.

Innovation Solution

Implementing evolutionary and genetic software and firmware improvement processes that generate, test, and deploy updates across diverse IoT devices using server computing devices and IoT devices, leveraging network communication technologies to automate and partially automate the update process, ensuring timely and effective updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual maintenance and updates are performed on IoT devices, then update reliability can be ensured, but the cost and difficulty increase significantly due to the large number and wide dispersion of devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated update mechanisms where IoT devices automatically receive, validate, and apply software updates without manual intervention. The server automatically manages the entire update lifecycle including distribution, validation through genetic algorithms, and deployment across dispersed devices, eliminating the need for manual maintenance while ensuring update reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by conducting extensive validation and testing of updates through genetic algorithms and simulation environments before actual deployment. Multiple validation levels are executed in advance to ensure update correctness, preventing failures before they occur in the field and reducing the need for manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If extensive validation and testing are performed on updates before deployment, then update correctness is improved, but the time required for updates is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate correctnessVSAvoidupdate time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation and testing of updates through genetic algorithms and simulation environments before actual deployment. Multiple validation levels are executed in advance to ensure update correctness, preventing failures before they occur in the field and reducing the need for manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial validation by applying different levels of testing to different updates based on risk assessment. Critical updates undergo extensive validation while less critical updates receive streamlined validation, balancing correctness requirements with time constraints. The genetic algorithm performs validation to the extent necessary to ensure correctness without excessive overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If automated update processes are implemented across dispersed IoT devices, then maintenance efficiency is improved, but the complexity of the update infrastructure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance efficiencyVSAvoidinfrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The update server implements multi-functionality by consolidating multiple maintenance operations into a single unified platform. It performs update generation, validation through genetic algorithms, simulation testing, deployment management, and rollback capabilities all through one infrastructure, improving maintenance efficiency without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary validation layer using genetic algorithms and simulation environments between update creation and deployment. This intermediary performs automated correctness verification, reducing the need for complex manual validation processes and simplifying the overall infrastructure while maintaining high maintenance efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If genetic algorithms and evolutionary processes are used to validate updates, then update quality is improved, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate qualityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is segmented into multiple independent levels: genetic algorithm-based validation, simulation environment testing, and production deployment validation. Each segment performs a specific function and can be executed independently, allowing computational resources to be distributed and managed efficiently while maintaining high update quality through comprehensive validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11106452B2Infrastructure for validating updates via a network of IoT-type devices
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 ARM LTD
  • US11106452B2 patent drawing
  • US11106452B2 patent drawing
  • US11106452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates generally to Internet of Things (IoT)-type devices and, more particularly, to infrastructure for validating updates via a network of IoT-type devices.