IP Analysis Platform Scoring Component Visualization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Analyzing intellectual-property portfolios to identify valuable insights and make informed decisions is challenging due to the vast amount of unanalyzed data and difficulty in determining relevant data types.

Innovation Solution

An intellectual-property analysis platform that generates visual representations and provides a qualitative analysis of IP assets using a scoring component with sub-components like coverage, opportunity, and exposure, accessible through user interfaces for efficient data visualization and decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If comprehensive IP portfolio data is collected and analyzed, then insight quality improves, but analysis complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIP portfolio insight qualityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the IP portfolio analysis into multiple independent modules including prior art search, patentability analysis, infringement analysis, and valuation analysis. Each module processes specific aspects of IP data independently, allowing parallel execution and reducing overall analysis time while maintaining comprehensive coverage of all relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary data collection, cleaning, and organization before main analysis begins. IP documents are pre-processed, classified, and indexed in advance, so when analysis is triggered, the system can immediately process structured data rather than raw unprocessed information, significantly reducing analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple data types are analyzed simultaneously, then decision-making accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal analysis framework that handles multiple data types (patent documents, technical specifications, market data, litigation records) through a single integrated system. The framework uses standardized processing pipelines and common data structures that can accommodate various input types without requiring separate specialized systems for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediate data layers and standardized interfaces between different analysis modules. These intermediaries translate various data types into a common format, enabling seamless integration of diverse information sources while keeping individual modules simple and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If detailed IP asset metrics are generated, then portfolio evaluation quality improves, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIP asset metric precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms complex IP assessment criteria into quantifiable parameters with defined weightings. Subjective evaluation factors are converted into measurable metrics through standardized scoring systems, allowing detailed evaluation while maintaining processing simplicity through mathematical aggregation of weighted parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240311858A1Intellectual-property analysis platform
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF MARYLAND
  • US20240311858A1 patent drawing
  • US20240311858A1 patent drawing
  • US20240311858A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generation and use of intellectual-property (IP) analysis platform architectures are disclosed. A scoring component may be utilized to produce scores for IP assets using user seeded searches in varying areas of interest, such as, for example, target markets, target technical fields, targeted publications, targeted products, and/or entity portfolios. The scoring component may be further utilized to produce an interactive graphical element including a spatial representation of the scoring of IP assets. The interactive graphical element may include various functionalities and/or information associated with the of IP assets. The scoring component may utilize data from a number of other components and/or sub-component to generate an innovation metric associated with a group of IP assets of a targeted entity, market, and/or technology space.