Outdoor IP Camera False Alarm Reduction via Video Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional home monitoring services face significant issues with false alarms, manual arming and disarming leading to user neglect, delayed responses to intruders, and stressful decision-making processes, with 98% of police visits being unnecessary due to false alarms.

Innovation Solution

An outdoor IP security camera system with a processor that analyzes video data to generate control signals, automatically adjusting security responses, initiating communications, and using machine learning to classify visitors, thereby reducing false alarms and enhancing response efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional alarm systems use basic sensors (door sensors, window sensors, PIR motion sensors) for intruder detection, then the system is simple and cost-effective, but it generates high false alarms (98% of police visits are unnecessary) and delayed responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical and basic sensor-based alarm systems with an IP camera system that uses video processing and machine learning algorithms to detect intruders. The system uses a processor to analyze video frames, detect motion patterns, and classify events, eliminating the need for traditional door sensors, window sensors, and PIR motion sensors that cause high false alarm rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameters from simple presence detection (motion sensors) to sophisticated video analysis parameters including facial recognition, gait analysis, object identification, and behavior pattern recognition. This allows the system to distinguish between legitimate visitors and intruders with high accuracy, reducing false alarms while maintaining system effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If conventional systems require manual arming and disarming of control panels, then the system can be configured to user's needs, but it creates false alarms due to user neglect and daily chores

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearming and disarming operationVSAvoidsystem activation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The IP camera system operates autonomously without requiring manual arming or disarming by the user. The system automatically detects intruders through video analysis, processes events locally, and triggers appropriate responses (alarms, notifications, police alerts) based on pre-configured rules. This eliminates the burden of manual operation while maintaining reliable system activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring detection rules, response protocols, and contact information during setup. Once configured, the system automatically executes these pre-planned actions when intruders are detected, eliminating the need for user intervention during critical moments and ensuring consistent, reliable response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional systems send simple alarm signals to central monitoring service, then the system is easy to implement, but it creates stressful decision-making for homeowners and delays police response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to intruderVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously analyzing video data, comparing detected events against established patterns, and adjusting detection sensitivity based on historical data. The system provides real-time feedback to users through notifications and can automatically confirm or cancel alerts based on event context, reducing false alarms and accelerating legitimate threat responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of video data locally before triggering external responses. The processor analyzes motion patterns, identifies objects, recognizes faces, and assesses potential threats in advance, then only sends confirmed alerts to monitoring services and police. This preliminary action filters out false alarms and ensures rapid response to genuine intrusions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10986717B1Reduced false alarms for outdoor IP security cameras
Publication Date: 2021.04.20 KUNA SYSTEMS CORP
  • US10986717B1 patent drawing
  • US10986717B1 patent drawing
  • US10986717B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus comprising a camera sensor and a processor. The camera sensor may be configured to generate video data of an area of interest. The processor may be configured to (A) analyze the video data, (B) generate control signals and (C) adjust a status of a plurality of security responses. The control signals may be generated in response to (a) the analysis of the video data and (b) the status of the security responses. The control signals may adjust an activation of the security responses. A first of the security responses may be activated in response to an event detected by the analysis of the video data. A first communication to a first contact may be initiated based on the analysis of the video data of the event. A second communication to a second contact may be initiated based on a response to the first communication.