IP Network Security Detection via Service Fingerprinting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

IP-based networks and devices in commercial and civilian use are vulnerable to security breaches, including Denial of Service Attacks, Unauthorized Usage, and Spoofing, due to insufficient monitoring and protection mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for detecting and alerting on security breaches in IP networks, utilizing a combination of methods such as surveying services, historical benchmark data, traceroute analysis, log analysis, passive DNS compromise systems, fingerprinting, watermarking, and unique private keys to identify and prevent vulnerabilities across the entire spectrum of IP network threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If IP-based networks and devices are deployed to improve security and quality of life, then security and quality of life are improved, but vulnerability to security breaches increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidvulnerability to security breaches
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring network traffic patterns, service availability, and device responses before actual attacks occur. It establishes baseline behavior profiles and detects deviations that indicate potential compromise, enabling preventive security measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by analyzing network responses, service availability status, and device behavior patterns to continuously update security assessments. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of security protocols and real-time detection of vulnerability changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If comprehensive monitoring and detection methods are implemented, then detection capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into modular detection components, each responsible for specific aspects such as service availability monitoring, network traffic analysis, or device response tracking. This segmentation allows comprehensive monitoring while maintaining manageable complexity through independent, reusable modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs universal monitoring mechanisms that can detect multiple types of security breaches through common protocols and standardized response patterns. A single monitoring framework handles diverse attack vectors by analyzing consistent behavioral indicators across different services and devices, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple detection methods are used to cover entire spectrum of attack vectors, then detection coverage is improved, but implementation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidimplementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system adapts to different attack vectors by dynamically changing monitoring parameters and detection thresholds rather than requiring separate detection methods for each threat type. It adjusts service response criteria, traffic pattern thresholds, and device behavior parameters to match the specific characteristics of detected attack patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies of network services and devices for monitoring purposes, allowing analysis of attack vectors without affecting actual production systems. These virtual instances replicate service behaviors and responses, enabling comprehensive detection coverage through safe experimentation and simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8806632B2Systems, methods, and devices for detecting security vulnerabilities in IP networks
Publication Date: 2014.08.12 SECURENET SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC
  • US8806632B2 patent drawing
  • US8806632B2 patent drawing
  • US8806632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention is a system, method, and apparatus for detecting compromise of IP devices that make up an IP-based network. One embodiment is a method for detecting and alerting on the following conditions: (1) Denial of Service Attack; (2) Unauthorized Usage Attack (for an IP camera, unauthorized person seeing a camera image); and (3) Spoofing Attack (for an IP camera, unauthorized person seeing substitute images). A survey of services running on the IP device, historical benchmark data, and traceroute information may be used to detect a possible Denial of Service Attack. A detailed log analysis and a passive DNS compromise system may be used to detect a possible unauthorized usage. Finally, a fingerprint (a hash of device configuration data) may be used as a private key to detect a possible spoofing attack. The present invention may be used to help mitigate intrusions and vulnerabilities in IP networks.