IP Valuation Bond for Regulatory Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The valuation of intellectual property assets is risky due to differing valuations by tribunals and agencies, creating compliance issues and liabilities, especially under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and existing insurance and financial guarantees are inadequate for illiquid IP assets.

Innovation Solution

A computer tool that uses traditional valuation methodologies, considers the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and patent file wrappers to establish an intellectual property valuation bond, mitigating financial risk by transferring it to a third-party underwriter, thus providing a persuasive market value for regulatory acceptance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional valuation methodologies are used for intellectual property assets, then valuation can be performed, but the valuation creates exposure to risk from differing valuations by tribunals and agencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation accuracyVSAvoidvaluation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a valuation bond as an intermediary mechanism between the IP owner and regulatory tribunles. The bond underwriter performs enhanced due diligence and provides a guaranteed valuation that tribunals can rely on, reducing the risk of conflicting valuation opinions while maintaining measurement precision through traditional methodologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The valuation bond provides beforehand cushioning by establishing a guaranteed valuation before potential disputes arise. The bond underwriter's pre-commitment to support the valuation creates a safety buffer against future challenges by tribunals or agencies, protecting the IP owner from valuation risks in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If professional liability insurance is used to protect corporate officers, then liability coverage is provided, but the insurance does not signal the quality of company assets or accuracy of management decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliability protectionVSAvoidasset quality signal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The valuation bond acts as an intermediary that provides both liability protection and quality signaling. The bond underwriter's independent due diligence and commitment to the valuation creates a credible signal of asset quality to stakeholders, while simultaneously providing liability protection similar to professional insurance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The valuation bond serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides liability protection like professional insurance, signals asset quality through the underwriter's endorsement, and offers financial guarantees. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by combining protection with information signaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If financial guarantees are used as collateral for IP loans, then collateral is provided, but the guarantee is only operational when the IP owner defaults on the loan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollateral securityVSAvoidguarantee availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The valuation bond performs preliminary action by establishing the valuation guarantee before any default occurs. The bond is active and operational from the outset, providing immediate financial support and validation, rather than waiting for default conditions to trigger its effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The bond provides beforehand cushioning by having the underwriter commit risk capital in advance to support the valuation. This creates an immediate safety buffer that is operational before any adverse events, unlike traditional collateral that only becomes relevant upon default.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Reliability

If insurance policies with bonding instruments are used to validate valuation assumptions, then valuation validation is provided, but they are limited to valuing tangible assets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation validationVSAvoidasset type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The valuation bond is designed with universality to work with both tangible and intangible assets, including intellectual property. The bonding instrument validates valuation assumptions across different asset types, resolving the limitation of traditional policies that only covered tangible assets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The bond structure is dynamic and adaptable to different asset types. It can be customized and adjusted to accommodate the unique characteristics of various assets, from tangible property to intangible intellectual property, providing versatile validation across asset classes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7536312B2Method of appraising and insuring intellectual property
Publication Date: 2009.05.19 OCEAN TOMO LLC
  • US7536312B2 patent drawing
  • US7536312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are disclosed for using computers, computer programs, algorithms and computer networks and communications hardware and protocols to appraise the value of assets as well as protecting asset owners from the risk that other entities will value those assets differently. The methods disclosed include:Supplementing traditional valuation methods with other considerations that may affect the value of intellectual property assets.Using insurance type financial instruments to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements such as those imposed by the Sarbanes Oxley Act, the SEC, or the IRS.Using insurance type financial instruments to protect intellectual property asset owners from the risk that tribunals, regulatory agencies, or other entities will appraise intellectual property assets at a different value.