IPDA Synthesis via Cyanide Ion Concentration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing processes for preparing isophoronediamine (IPDA) through catalytic hydrogenation and reductive amination of isophoronenitrile (IPN) face challenges such as low yield, catalyst deactivation due to HCN, and formation of unwanted by-products like amino alcohol and bicyclic compounds, which are not effectively addressed by minimizing cyanide ion concentration as previously thought.

Innovation Solution

Increasing the cyanide ion concentration in the reaction mixture to a range of 200 ppmw to 5000 ppmw, achieved through controlled HCN elimination or addition of cyanide salts, allows for enhanced selectivity and yield of IPDA by promoting the conversion of IPN to IPDA without deactivating the catalyst.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cyanide ion concentration is minimized to prevent catalyst deactivation, then catalyst reliability is improved, but IPDA yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst reliabilityVSAvoidIPDA yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the cyanide ion concentration to a specific range (200-5000 ppmw) rather than minimizing it. This quantitative parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by finding the optimal concentration level that maintains catalyst reliability while maximizing IPDA yield, transforming the harmful effect of cyanide into a beneficial catalytic promoter at controlled levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of cyanide ion elimination into a benefit by deliberately maintaining controlled cyanide concentrations. Instead of viewing cyanide elimination as necessary to prevent catalyst deactivation, the invention recognizes that controlled cyanide presence promotes the desired reaction pathway, converting what was previously considered a harmful factor into a beneficial catalytic element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Productivity

If ammonia excess is increased to improve IPDA yield, then IPDA yield is improved, but amino alcohol by-product formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIPDA yieldVSAvoidamino alcohol by-product
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing multiple parameters simultaneously: cyanide ion concentration (200-5000 ppmw), ammonia-to-nitrile ratio (0.5-5:1), temperature (50-150°C), and pressure (1-50 atm). This multi-parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by finding the specific combination that maximizes IPDA yield while suppressing amino alcohol formation through controlled reaction conditions rather than simple ammonia excess.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If imination catalysts are used to accelerate IPNI formation, then IPDA yield is improved, but HCN elimination increases causing catalyst poisoning

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIPDA yieldVSAvoidHCN elimination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful HCN elimination into a benefit by recognizing that controlled cyanide presence from HCN dissociation actually promotes the hydrogenation reaction. Instead of preventing HCN elimination, the invention utilizes the resulting cyanide ions as beneficial catalyst modifiers that enhance IPDA formation while preventing complete catalyst deactivation through controlled concentration maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling reaction temperature (50-150°C) and cyanide ion concentration (200-5000 ppmw) to optimize the balance between imination catalyst activity and HCN elimination. This parameter optimization allows sufficient IPNI formation while maintaining cyanide levels that prevent catalyst poisoning, resolving the contradiction between productivity and harmful by-product formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the selectivity and yield of IPDA while reducing the formation of unwanted by-products, with optimal results achieved at a cyanide ion concentration of 3000 ppmw, demonstrating a surprising benefit of higher cyanide levels in the process.

Implementation Method 1

catalytic hydrogenation and/or catalytic reductive amination of isophoronenitrile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic hydrogenation: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

catalytic hydrogenation and/or catalytic reductive amination of isophoronenitrile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReductive amination: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

IPN and ammonia form, through elimination of water, isophoronenitrileimine, IPNI, which is subsequently hydrogenated to IPDA

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentUS8877976B2Process for preparing 3-aminomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexylamine
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 EVONIK OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US8877976B2 patent drawing
  • US8877976B2 patent drawing
  • US8877976B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to an improved process for preparing 3-aminomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexylamine, referred to hereinafter as isophoronediamine or IPDA for short, by means of catalytic hydrogenation and/or catalytic reductive amination (also referred to as aminating hydrogenation) of 3-cyano-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexanone, also called isophoronenitrile or IPN for short hereinafter.