IPM Magnet Magnetic Path Length Demagnetization Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Interior permanent magnet (IPM) motors face demagnetization issues due to high excitation currents, leading to irreversible demagnetization of permanent magnets, especially when field-weakening control is employed, which increases the risk of demagnetization and requires costly solutions like using rare earth elements or increasing magnet thickness/volume.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates magnets with magnetic paths oriented at angles closer to the d-axis, featuring longer magnetic paths than the magnet thickness, and a manufacturing method that aligns easy axes of magnetization along these paths to enhance demagnetization resistance without increasing material thickness, thereby reducing demagnetization risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If field-weakening control is employed to increase rotational speed, then the operational range of the motor is extended, but the demagnetization field acting on permanent magnets increases causing irreversible demagnetization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational speedVSAvoidmagnet demagnetization resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the magnetic path length parameter of the permanent magnet, making it longer than the thickness dimension. This parameter change increases the demagnetization resistance without requiring material composition changes or increased magnet volume, thereby allowing field-weakening control to be performed while preventing irreversible demagnetization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If magnet thickness is increased to improve demagnetization resistance, then the resistance against demagnetization field is enhanced, but the device volume and material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemagnetization resistanceVSAvoidmagnet volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing magnet thickness, the patent changes the magnetic path length parameter to be longer than the thickness dimension. This allows achieving higher demagnetization resistance while maintaining compact magnet volume and avoiding increased material costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If rare earth elements are used to enhance demagnetization resistance, then the resistance against demagnetization field is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemagnetization resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves improved demagnetization resistance through geometric parameter optimization (magnetic path length > thickness) rather than material composition changes. This avoids the need for expensive rare earth elements while maintaining effective demagnetization resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Power

If high excitation current is applied to increase torque output, then the torque density of the motor is improved, but the demagnetization field strength increases causing magnet demagnetization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque densityVSAvoidmagnet demagnetization resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By optimizing the magnetic path length parameter to be longer than the thickness dimension, the patent enables the motor to withstand higher excitation currents without demagnetization. This allows achieving high torque density while maintaining magnet reliability under high current operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration strengthens the magnetic force against demagnetization fields, effectively reducing demagnetization and enhancing the demagnetization resistance of the magnets, thus improving the performance and reliability of IPM motors without increasing material costs.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the magnets has magnetic paths each having a length longer than a thickness dimension of the corresponding one of the magnets between the opposing flux effective surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

Each of the magnets has a plurality of easy axes of magnetization; the easy axes of magnetization are oriented to be along the respective magnetic paths

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEasy axes of magnetization: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11349420B2Rotary electric machine, rotary electric machine drive system, magnet, method of manufacturing magnet, magnetizing apparatus, and magnet unit
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 DENSO CORP
  • US11349420B2 patent drawing
  • US11349420B2 patent drawing
  • US11349420B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a rotary electric machine, magnets provided in a core generate circumferentially arranged magnetic poles. Each magnetic pole defines d- and q-axes. The d-axis represents a center of the corresponding magnetic pole. The rotary electric machine includes an armature including an armature winding. Each magnet includes a magnet body having opposing first and second flux effective surfaces. The first flux effective surface is a surface out of which magnetic flux flows. The second flux effective surface into which magnetic flux flows. The magnet body has a thickness defined as a minimum distance between the first and second flux effective surfaces. The magnet body has easy axes of magnetization. A length of a line along at least one of the easy axes of magnetization between the first and second flux effective surfaces is longer than the thickness of the magnet body.