Reduced Control Cycle Current Regulator for IPM Motor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing current regulators for vehicle electric traction motors with interior permanent magnet (IPM) motors require multiple control cycles to achieve current commands, leading to overshoot, lag, and vibration due to operating point-dependent parameters and saturation effects, which are not effectively addressed by prior discrete control strategies.

Innovation Solution

A reduced control cycle current regulator that uses a model inverse method with parameter lookup tables or polynomial functions to adjust transfer function parameters based on feedback, enabling accurate current injection in one or two control cycles by accounting for operating point dependence and saturation, employing a forward prediction filter, differentiator, and look-up tables to mitigate speed-dependent errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional current regulator is used for IPM motor control, then the control system can operate, but it requires multiple control cycles to achieve current commands, causing overshoot, lag, and vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent control accuracyVSAvoidcontrol cycle duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing transfer function parameters (inductance and resistance values) in lookup tables before operation. During control cycles, the system retrieves pre-computed parameters based on operating conditions (current magnitude and shaft speed) rather than calculating them in real-time. This preparation in advance enables the current regulator to achieve accurate current commands in one or two control cycles, eliminating overshoot and lag without requiring multiple iterative adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If discrete control strategies are used, then the control implementation is simple, but they cannot effectively address operating point-dependent parameters and saturation effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementation simplicityVSAvoidcurrent control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by dynamically adjusting transfer function parameters (inductance Ld, Lq and resistance Rs) based on operating conditions. Lookup tables store pre-computed parameter values corresponding to different current magnitudes and shaft speeds. The system selects appropriate parameters based on real-time operating point feedback, enabling accurate control across varying conditions including saturation effects. This approach maintains implementation simplicity through table lookup while achieving high precision by adapting parameters to actual operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the actual current magnitude and shaft speed are continuously measured and fed back to the current regulator. This feedback enables the system to identify the current operating point and select appropriate transfer function parameters from lookup tables. The feedback loop ensures that parameter changes are synchronized with actual motor conditions, maintaining control precision across the entire operating range while keeping the control structure manageable through systematic parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If fixed transfer function parameters are used, then the control algorithm is simple, but speed-dependent errors occur in direct-axis and quadrature-axis current control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol algorithm complexityVSAvoidcurrent measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from fixed transfer function parameters to dynamic parameters that adapt to changing operating conditions. Lookup tables store transfer function parameters (inductance and resistance) corresponding to different shaft speeds and current magnitudes. The system dynamically selects appropriate parameters based on real-time feedback of actual operating conditions. This dynamic parameter adaptation eliminates speed-dependent errors in direct-axis and quadrature-axis current control while maintaining algorithm simplicity through systematic table lookup and parameter selection based on operating point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11689138B2Reduced control cycle current regulator for vehicle electric traction motor
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11689138B2 patent drawing
  • US11689138B2 patent drawing
  • US11689138B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system in a vehicle includes a current regulator to obtain current commands from a controller based on a torque input and provide voltage commands and an inverter to use the voltage commands from the current regulator and direct current (DC) supplied by a battery to provide alternating current (AC). The system also includes an electric traction motor to provide drive power to a transmission of the vehicle based on injection of the AC from the inverter. The current regulator adjusts parameters of a transfer function implemented by the current regulator, based on feedback of an input to and an output from the electric traction motor to achieve the AC corresponding with the torque input in no more than two control cycles.