IPv6 VANET Communication via Dual Logical Links

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) face challenges in enabling IPv6 communication due to the lack of shared communication facilities compatible with IPv6 mechanisms, particularly with IPv6 StateLess Address AutoConfiguration (SLAAC) and Neighbor Discovery, as they rely on extended radio coverage through wireless multi-hop technology, which does not support the concept of a single link-local connection between an Access Router and mobile nodes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of two types of logical links: Geographical (G) links, designed to be link-local multicast capable by mapping IPv6 link-local multicast addresses into sub-IP geographical areas, and Topological (T) links, with topological logical boundaries, allowing for flexible IPv6 packet routing and compatibility with standard IPv6 mechanisms, enabling hybrid vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If wireless multi-hop technology is used to extend radio coverage in VANETs, then the network coverage and connectivity are improved, but the compatibility with IPv6 link-local mechanisms (SLAAC, Neighbor Discovery) deteriorates because these mechanisms rely on a single direct link between Access Router and mobile nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradio coverage areaVSAvoidcompatibility with IPv6 link-local mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into two distinct logical link types: G-links (geographical links) for direct AR-to-node communication that supports IPv6 link-local mechanisms, and T-links (topological links) for multi-hop node-to-node communication. This segmentation allows each link type to be optimized for its specific function, with G-links maintaining compatibility with standard IPv6 mechanisms while T-links enabling extended wireless coverage through multi-hop routing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces G-links as an intermediary mechanism that bridges the gap between multi-hop T-links and IPv6 link-local requirements. G-links act as virtual direct connections that allow mobile nodes to participate in SLAAC and Neighbor Discovery processes even when physically connected through multiple hops, thus mediating between the physical multi-hop topology and the logical single-link requirement of IPv6 mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single link-local capable link between Access Router and mobile nodes is required for IPv6 SLAAC, then compatibility with standard IPv6 mechanisms is improved, but the ability to support wireless multi-hop technology deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with IPv6 SLAACVSAvoidnetwork topology complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into G-links that provide link-local IPv6 functionality and T-links that provide multi-hop routing capability. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing mobile nodes to have G-links to Access Routers for IPv6 SLAAC compatibility while simultaneously using T-links for multi-hop wireless communication, thus maintaining standard IPv6 mechanism support without limiting network topology flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal link model where mobile nodes can simultaneously utilize both G-links and T-links depending on the communication requirement. G-links provide universal compatibility with IPv6 link-local mechanisms, while T-links provide universal support for multi-hop routing, allowing the network to adapt to different communication scenarios without sacrificing either capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If geographic routing protocol is implemented in VANETs, then routing efficiency and position-based service capability are improved, but the ability to provide access to external infrastructure network deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting efficiencyVSAvoidaccess to external infrastructure network
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments routing into geographic routing for VANET internal communication (improving routing efficiency through position-based forwarding) and IPv6 routing for external infrastructure access. The dual link model enables this segmentation by using T-links for geographic routing within the VANET and G-links for IPv6-based communication with external networks, thus maintaining both routing efficiency and external network accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

G-links serve as intermediaries that enable mobile nodes to access external infrastructure networks while maintaining geographic routing efficiency. Through G-links, nodes can obtain IPv6 addresses via SLAAC and communicate with external networks using standard IPv6 routing, while T-links continue to handle efficient geographic routing for local VANET communication, thus mediating between geographic routing and external network access requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2377348B1System and method for enabling ipv6-based communication in a vanet
Publication Date: 2018.03.07 NEC CORP
  • EP2377348B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2377348B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2377348B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A communication node for enabling IPv6-based communication in ad hoc network, wherein the communication node being storing a geographic position of the communication node, wherein a position based routing protocol is implemented for IPv6 packet, and wherein in said communication node at least two different types of logical links are provided for the transport of the IPv6 packet over sub-IP geographical routing, wherein one of said at least two different types of logical links is a geographical link being designed to have geographically scoped boundaries, wherein one of said at least two different types of logical links is a topological link being designed to have topologically scoped boundaries, is characterized in that said geographical link is a link-local multicast capable link and the IPv6 packet is transmitted with link-local multicast address via the geographical link. Furthermore, a corresponding method for a communication node for enabling IPv6-based communication in an ad hoc network is disclosed.