Automated Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI Using IPVL

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manual segmentation methods for brain tumors in MRI images are subjective, time-consuming, and prone to inter-rater discrepancies due to variability in imaging methodologies and overlap between tumor and normal anatomic structures, limiting their effectiveness in accurately discriminating glioblastoma subtypes.

Innovation Solution

An automated method using iterative probabilistic voxel labeling (IPVL) that combines region-growing and k-means-based tissue segmentation with k-nearest neighbor (KNN) and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) classifiers to reliably segment brain tumors by training on voxel intensity and spatial coordinates, enabling robust and consistent labeling of tumor volumes across different scanners and protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual segmentation methods are used for brain tumors in MRI images, then segmentation can be performed with current imaging methodologies, but the process is subjective, time-consuming, and prone to inter-rater discrepancies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation timeVSAvoidsegmentation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical segmentation processes with an automated computational system that uses MRI image data, voxel intensity values, and spatial coordinates to automatically classify and segment tumor regions. This substitution eliminates human subjectivity and variability while maintaining or improving segmentation accuracy through consistent application of classification algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The segmentation system performs self-service by automatically processing MRI images without requiring manual intervention. The algorithm independently extracts features, trains classifiers, and generates segmentation results, making the process autonomous and eliminating the need for repeated manual segmentation by different raters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated classification algorithms are used to segment brain tumors, then segmentation time is reduced, but reliability in discriminating tumor subtypes improves only with consistent imaging methodologies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation timeVSAvoidtumor subtype discrimination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used for segmentation from relying solely on imaging methodology consistency to using multiple features including voxel intensity values, spatial coordinates, and MRI image data. This multi-parameter approach allows the classification algorithms to reliably discriminate tumor subtypes even when imaging methodologies vary, as the algorithms can adapt to different imaging characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If iterative probabilistic voxel labeling with multiple classifiers is implemented, then tumor volume identification accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor volume identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the classification process into distinct stages: extracting features from MRI images, training multiple classifiers (KNN and GMM) separately, and then combining their results through iterative probabilistic voting. This segmentation of the computational process allows each classifier to specialize in specific aspects of tumor identification, improving overall accuracy while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves highly consistent results with operator-defined volumes, reducing segmentation time significantly and improving the accuracy of tumor volume identification, even with limited imaging sequences, thus facilitating quantitative analysis and clinical decision-making.

Implementation Method 1

MRI is based on the property of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). NMR is a physical property in which the nuclei of atoms absorb and re-emit electromagnetic energy at a specific resonance frequency in the presence of a magnetic field.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNuclear magnetic resonance (NMR): Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS10169685B2Automatic segmentation and quantitative parameterization of brain tumors in MRI
Publication Date: 2019.01.01 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US10169685B2 patent drawing
  • US10169685B2 patent drawing
  • US10169685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques, systems, and devices are described for implementing automatic segmentation and quantitative parameterization of MRI images. For example, the disclosed method includes processing the MRI image to correct any distortions; performing a preliminary segmentation of the MRI image to assign a tissue label of a set of tissue labels to one or more preliminary volumes of voxels of the MRI image; comparing each voxel of the MRI image with the one or more preliminary volumes of voxels with an assigned tissue label and assigning each voxel of the MRI image a probability of being associated with each tissue label of the set of tissue labels; and assigning each voxel of the MRI image a tissue label according to its greatest probability among probabilities for each voxel being associated with the set of tissue labels.