Interventional Radiology Structured Reporting Workflow
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional radiology information systems lack a structured data collection capability tailored to interventional radiology procedures, limiting the efficiency of data collection and presentation for statistical, clinical, and scientific functions.
Innovation Solution
A system with a graphical user interface and database structure specifically designed for interventional radiology, allowing for the collection and generation of structured reports that include anatomical atlases and graphical data entry, enabling easy data entry and automatic report generation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If conventional radiology information systems are used, then general radiology functions are supported, but structured data collection capability for interventional radiology procedures is lacking
Solution Approach 1:
The system divides the reporting workflow into distinct components: data entry sheets for structured data collection, graphical worksheets for visual annotations, and text reporting worksheets for narrative documentation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while working together within the integrated IRIS system.
Solution Approach 2:
The anatomical atlas serves multiple functions: it provides a visual reference for procedural documentation, enables graphical annotations of procedural steps, facilitates structured data collection through linked data entry fields, and supports both clinical reporting and research data extraction. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by making the system adaptable without proportionally increasing complexity.
2Ease of operation
If conventional RIS interfaces are used, then basic reporting functions are available, but data presentation is not tailored to interventional radiology needs
Solution Approach 1:
The interface provides different presentation formats tailored to specific interventional radiology needs: structured data entry fields for quantitative parameters, graphical worksheets with anatomical overlays for spatial relationships, and text reporting sections for procedural narratives. Each format optimizes the presentation of specific types of procedural information.
Solution Approach 2:
The anatomical atlas acts as an intermediary between raw procedural data and the final report, providing a visual framework that organizes and contextualizes interventional radiology data. It mediates between the complexity of procedural information and the need for clear, tailored presentation.
3Productivity
If manual report compilation is performed, then flexibility in report creation is maintained, but time efficiency and productivity are reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by automatically populating structured data fields from integrated imaging and procedural data sources, pre-organizing information according to the anatomical atlas framework, and preparing draft report sections before the physician needs to review or finalize the report. This reduces the time required for manual compilation.
Solution Approach 2:
The system enables self-service reporting by allowing physicians to efficiently enter and annotate procedural data directly into structured fields and graphical worksheets during or immediately after the procedure, with the system automatically organizing this data into formatted reports. This eliminates the need for separate, time-consuming report compilation sessions.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
A computer-implemented method and system are provided for interventional radiology (IR) structured report workflow management. The method and system store an interventional radiology structured (IRS) workflow 300 including multiple structured reports 302 associated with corresponding interventional procedures. Multiple anatomical atlases 320 are stored that correspond to separate vascular districts. The method and system collect interventional radiology (IR) data corresponding to a select IR procedure and a vascular district of interest and obtain a candidate anatomical atlas 506 from the multiple anatomical atlases based on the IR data. The candidate anatomical atlas 506 illustrates the vascular district model associated with the select IR procedure. The method and system create a structured report 502, 552 based on the IR data collected, the structured report including the candidate anatomical atlas illustrating the vascular district model associated with the select IR procedure.