Iron Citrate Injection for Nuclear Reactor Radiation Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiation exposure reduction techniques for nuclear power plant workers face challenges in uniformly controlling iron concentration in coolants and achieving effective ferritization of radionuclides on reactor core surfaces, leading to increased workload and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

Injecting soluble organic iron, such as iron citrate, or iron oxalate with a particle diameter of 3 μm or less into the coolant to ferritize and fix nickel and cobalt radionuclides on the reactor core structure, reducing the need for electrolysis and mechanical cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If electrolysis operation is used to obtain iron ions, then iron can be injected into coolant, but the generation speed of iron ions varies and iron concentration cannot be uniformly controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron concentration in coolantVSAvoiduniformity of iron concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/electrical electrolysis system with a chemical dissolution system. Iron powder is dissolved in acid solution to produce iron ions, which are then injected into the coolant. This chemical method provides more stable and controllable iron ion generation compared to electrolysis, resolving the issue of non-uniform iron concentration control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If electrolysis operation is used to obtain iron ions, then iron can be injected into coolant, but mechanical cleaning is needed to remove oxide film and workload is heavy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload for handling devicesVSAvoidtime for mechanical cleaning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical cleaning process with a chemical dissolution process. Instead of mechanically removing oxide films from electrodes, the iron powder is chemically dissolved in acid solution, which automatically removes oxide layers and prepares the iron for injection. This eliminates the need for separate mechanical cleaning operations and reduces overall workload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces acid solution as an intermediary substance that facilitates the conversion of iron powder to iron ions. The acid acts as a mediator that dissolves the iron powder and removes oxide films, enabling the iron injection process without requiring direct mechanical intervention. This intermediary chemical process simplifies the overall operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If iron oxide is injected into coolant, then ferritization of nickel or cobalt can proceed, but iron oxide has lower reactivity and good ferritization cannot be expected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveferritization effectivenessVSAvoidlow reactivity of iron oxide
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical form of iron from oxide to metallic powder or ionic form. By using iron powder that is chemically more reactive, or by dissolving iron powder in acid to produce iron ions, the reactivity parameter is significantly increased compared to iron oxide. This enhanced reactivity ensures effective ferritization of nickel and cobalt in the coolant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for efficient and controlled ferritization of nickel and cobalt on the fuel cladding tube surfaces, reducing radiation exposure and simplifying the handling process by maintaining uniform iron concentration and reducing workload.

Implementation Method 1

Injecting soluble organic iron, such as iron citrate, or iron oxalate with a particle diameter of 3 μm or less into the coolant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

ferritizing and fixing radionuclides or parent nuclides thereof, which are contained in the coolant, on the surface of a reactor core structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFerritization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

the ferritization of nickel or cobalt easily proceeds on the surface of the fuel cladding tube by the operation of the boiling and condensation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoiling: Boiling

Implementation Method 4

the ferritization of nickel or cobalt easily proceeds on the surface of the fuel cladding tube by the operation of the boiling and condensation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS8798225B2Radiation exposure reduction method
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 KK TOSHIBA
  • US8798225B2 patent drawing
  • US8798225B2 patent drawing
  • US8798225B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radiation exposure reduction method includes the steps of: injecting iron into a coolant which flows from the reactor cooling system to the reactor core in a nuclear power plant; and ferritizing and fixing radionuclides or parent nuclides thereof, which are contained in the coolant, on the surface of a reactor core structure, wherein an iron citrate which is soluble organic iron, or iron oxalate or iron fumarate which has a particle diameter of 3 μm or less, is used as the iron to be injected into the coolant.