Iron-Based Core-Shell Nanoparticles for Rare-Earth-Free Magnets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current permanent magnets rely on rare earth elements, which are scarce, expensive, and environmentally detrimental, with manufacturing processes being costly and environmentally harmful, necessitating the development of alternative magnetic materials.

Innovation Solution

The creation of iron-based core-shell nanoparticles and alloy compositions with non-magnetic, anti-ferromagnetic, or ferromagnetic shells, formed through techniques like immersion in salt compositions or nitriding, to enhance coercivity and magnetic properties without using rare earth elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rare earth elements are used in permanent magnets, then high energy product and magnetic properties are achieved, but supply availability, cost, and environmental impact worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic propertiesVSAvoidsupply availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates rare earth elements from the magnetic material composition entirely, replacing them with iron-based materials. This is achieved through specific heat treatment processes that transform iron into a magnetic phase without requiring any rare earth elements, thus resolving the supply availability issue while maintaining magnetic functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes expensive rare earth elements with inexpensive iron-based materials. The iron-based magnetic material provides comparable magnetic properties at significantly lower cost, addressing both the cost and supply availability concerns associated with rare earth elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If rare earth elements are used in permanent magnets, then high energy product is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy productVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive rare earth elements with inexpensive iron-based materials that achieve comparable energy product. The manufacturing process uses standard heat treatment techniques rather than complex rare earth processing, significantly reducing production costs while maintaining high energy product performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material composition parameters from rare earth-based to iron-based, and adjusts heat treatment parameters (temperature, time, atmosphere) to achieve the desired magnetic properties. This parameter transformation enables cost-effective manufacturing while preserving high energy product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If rare earth elements are used in permanent magnets, then high magnetic performance is achieved, but environmental deterioration worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic performanceVSAvoidenvironmental deterioration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes rare earth elements from the magnetic material system, eliminating the environmental harm associated with their mining and processing. The iron-based alternative requires no rare earth extraction, thus resolving the environmental deterioration issue while maintaining magnetic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of rare earth element extraction into benefit by using abundant iron instead. This substitution transforms an environmentally harmful process into an environmentally friendly one, achieving high magnetic performance without ecological damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Reliability

If Fe16N2 phase is manufactured using conventional methods, then large magnetic anisotropy constant and saturation magnetization are achieved, but manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic anisotropy constantVSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary heat treatment to iron particles before final magnetic phase formation. This pre-treatment prepares the iron structure for subsequent transformation into Fe16N2 phase, making the overall manufacturing process more achievable and less difficult than conventional direct synthesis methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transition of iron under controlled heat treatment conditions to form the Fe16N2 magnetic phase. By controlling temperature, time, and atmospheric parameters during heat treatment, the transformation from ordinary iron to high-performance Fe16N2 phase is achieved through a manageable phase transition process rather than difficult direct synthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These iron-based core-shell nanoparticles and alloy compositions achieve magnetic properties comparable to or exceeding those of rare-earth magnets, with high coercivity and energy product, while utilizing abundant and inexpensive iron and nitrogen, reducing environmental impact and production costs.

Implementation Method 1

nitriding a composition comprising an iron-based core to form a shell comprising iron nitride on the iron-based core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNitriding: Nitriding

Implementation Method 2

depositing a shell on an iron-based core by at least immersing the iron-based core in a salt composition for a predetermined period of time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS11837393B2Iron-based nanoparticles and grains
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
  • US11837393B2 patent drawing
  • US11837393B2 patent drawing
  • US11837393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example nanoparticles may include an iron-based core, and a shell. The shell may include a non-magnetic, anti-ferromagnetic, or ferrimagnetic material. Example alloy compositions may include an iron-based grain, and a grain boundary. The grain boundary may include a non-magnetic, anti-ferromagnetic, or ferrimagnetic material. Example techniques for forming iron-based core-shell nanoparticles may include depositing a shell on an iron-based core. The depositing may include immersing the iron-based core in a salt composition for a predetermined period of time. The depositing may include milling the iron-based core with a salt composition for a predetermined period of time. Example techniques for treating a composition comprising core-shell nanoparticles may include nitriding the composition.