Iron Electrode Bismuth Additive Suppress Hydrogen Evolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Iron-based batteries face limitations in charging efficiency due to hydrogen evolution and inability to discharge at high rates, which hinder their deployment in large-scale energy storage systems.

Innovation Solution

The use of carbonyl iron powder combined with metal sulfide additives like bismuth, and organosulfur compounds to suppress hydrogen evolution and enhance discharge rate capability, resulting in a high-performance iron electrode with improved charging efficiency and rapid discharge capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional iron electrodes are used, then the battery structure is simple and cost-effective, but hydrogen evolution occurs during charging resulting in low charging efficiency (55-70%)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging efficiencyVSAvoidhydrogen evolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A bismuth-based additive is introduced as an intermediary substance on the iron electrode surface. The bismuth forms a catalyst layer that mediates the charging reaction, preferentially facilitating iron hydroxide reduction while suppressing hydrogen evolution reaction, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining simple electrode structure and achieving high charging efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The electrode surface properties are modified by adding bismuth, which changes the electrochemical parameters of the electrode. This alters the reaction kinetics and electrode potential characteristics, enabling selective suppression of hydrogen evolution while maintaining iron reduction efficiency, thus improving charging efficiency without complex structural changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If iron electrode is discharged at high rates, then power delivery is improved, but capacity is severely limited due to passivation by iron (II) hydroxide

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedischarge rate capabilityVSAvoidcapacity retention
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bismuth-based additive acts as a mediator that prevents direct contact between the iron (II) hydroxide discharge product and the iron electrode surface. This intermediary layer blocks the passivation mechanism, allowing high rate discharge to proceed without capacity loss, thus simultaneously achieving high power and reliable capacity retention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If overcharging is performed to compensate for hydrogen evolution, then full capacity is achieved, but water loss from electrolyte increases and energy efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery capacityVSAvoidwater loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The bismuth additive converts the harmful hydrogen evolution reaction into a beneficial selective catalysis process. It directs the charging current preferentially toward the desired iron reduction reaction, eliminating the need for overcharging to achieve full capacity, thereby preventing water loss and improving energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

A ten-fold decrease in hydrogen evolution rate and a twenty-fold increase in discharge rate capacity are achieved, leading to a charging efficiency of 96% and enabling iron-based batteries to meet the requirements for grid-scale energy storage.

Implementation Method 1

The hydrogen evolution reaction occurs because the electrode potential for this reaction is positive to that of the iron electrode reaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogen evolution reaction: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

The discharge rate capability of the iron electrode can be improved if the passivation by the electrically non-conductive iron (II) hydroxide, (the discharge product) can be mitigated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPassivation: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

The electrochemistry of the iron electrode in alkaline batteries involves the redox process involving iron (II) hydroxide and elemental iron

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reaction: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentEP3355394B1High efficiency iron electrode and additives for use in rechargeable iron-based batteries
Publication Date: 2020.09.16 UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • EP3355394B1 patent drawingFigure 1(a)~2
  • EP3355394B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4(b)
  • EP3355394B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An iron electrode for use in an iron-based rechargeable battery is disclosed. In one embodiment, the iron electrode comprises carbonyl iron, a polymeric binder, and an additive for suppressing hydrogen evolution at the iron electrode during charging of the iron-based rechargeable battery, wherein the additive includes bismuth sulfide in an amount from 1 to 10 w/w % bismuth sulfide of the weight of the iron electrode.