Amide-Amine Flotation for Iron Ore Slimes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current iron ore processing methods face challenges in efficiently separating quartz and kaolinite from iron minerals in tailings, leading to low metallurgical recoveries and high contaminant content, requiring the use of depressants which hinder the process and result in inefficient disposal of ultrafine particles in dams, posing environmental and economic risks.

Innovation Solution

A reverse cationic flotation process is developed without the use of depressants, utilizing amide-amine collectors at a pH range of 8.5 to 10.5, combined with high-intensity magnetic concentration, to selectively separate iron minerals from quartz and kaolinite, allowing for the recovery of iron-rich concentrates with reduced contaminant content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If reverse flotation is performed using conventional cationic collectors and depressants, then quartz and kaolinite can be separated from iron minerals, but metallurgical recovery is low and contaminant content is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidmetallurgical recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pH parameter from conventional ranges to specifically 9.0-10.5, and modifies the collector structure to amide-amine type with specific molecular weight ranges (150-300 Daltons), which fundamentally alters the flotation mechanism to achieve high iron recovery while maintaining separation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite reagent systems combining amide-amine collectors with specific molecular weights and structures, creating a synergistic effect that selectively targets iron minerals while leaving gangue minerals unaffected, thereby resolving the contradiction between separation efficiency and metallurgical recovery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If ultrafine particles are removed by desliming before flotation, then flotation efficiency is improved, but the amount of tailings disposed in dams increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflotation efficiencyVSAvoidtailings volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating parameters to enable effective flotation of ultrafine particles (pH 9.0-10.5, specific collector dosages of 50-200 g/t), eliminating the need for desliming and thereby reducing tailings volume while maintaining or improving flotation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The flotation process itself serves the dual function of both concentrating iron minerals and effectively processing ultrafine particles that would otherwise require separate desliming treatment, making the system self-sufficient and reducing waste disposal requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If depressants are added to improve flotation selectivity, then separation between iron minerals and gangue is enhanced, but process complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflotation selectivityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the depressant component from the conventional flotation system, relying instead on the selective action of amide-amine collectors at controlled pH levels to achieve high flotation selectivity without adding process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses pH control as an intermediary mechanism to mediate the interaction between collectors and minerals, creating selective flotation conditions without requiring additional chemical additives or complex process steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves high iron recovery (>90%) and produces concentrates with >60% iron content and low impurities, reducing the volume of tailings disposed in dams and enhancing the economic viability of iron ore processing by effectively utilizing ultrafine particles.

Implementation Method 1

a cationic collector is added to the pulp, which consists of a petroleum-derived organic branched-chain ether-amine class reagent, having as purpose to change the surface of quartz particles from hydrophilic to hydrophobic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobicity: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 2

reverse cationic flotation with the addition of amide-amine type collectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlotation: Froth Floatation

Implementation Method 3

high intensity magnetic concentration for the production of a product with high iron content

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic separation: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS11453014B2Concentration process of iron ore slimes
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 VALE SA
  • US11453014B2 patent drawing
  • US11453014B2 patent drawing
  • US11453014B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application relates to a concentration process of iron minerals from ultrafine tailings (slimes) from iron ore processing through reverse flotation with pH between 8.5 and 10.5 with the addition of amide-amine type collector, or further a mixture thereof with traditional cationic collectors (amines), in the absence of any depressant, alternatively including a step of high field magnetic concentration, which allows to obtain a concentrate with iron content higher than 66% and contents of SiO2+Al2O3 below 4%.