Iron Polyphosphate Stock Solution pH Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fertigation processes using inorganic iron nutrient compositions often result in chemical precipitation, leading to iron deficiencies and clogging issues in irrigation systems due to the basic pH of these compositions, which affects storage stability and solubility, especially when pH adjustments to avoid precipitation compromise storage stability.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the provision of stock solutions with iron and polyphosphates at a pH range of 4.5 to 6.2, specifically adjusted by adding acid and ensuring intensive mixing conditions to maintain solubility and prevent precipitation, thereby ensuring stable iron delivery in fertigation systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If inorganic iron nutrient compositions with basic pH are used in fertigation, then iron solubility is improved, but chemical precipitation occurs leading to iron deficiencies and clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage stability of iron solutionVSAvoidchemical precipitation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pH parameter from basic (conventional) to acidic (4.5-6.2 range) to prevent calcium phosphate precipitation while maintaining iron solubility through polyphosphate complexation. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by finding an optimal pH window that avoids both precipitation and iron deficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Polyphosphates serve as an intermediary substance that complexes with iron ions to maintain solubility in acidic conditions. This mediator allows iron to remain dissolved at lower pH levels where it would otherwise precipitate, while also preventing calcium phosphate formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If acid is added to adjust pH to prevent precipitation, then chemical precipitation is reduced, but storage stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical precipitationVSAvoidstorage stability of iron solution
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies and implements an optimal pH range (4.5-6.2) that balances two competing requirements: low enough to prevent calcium phosphate precipitation but high enough to maintain iron-polyphosphate complex stability. This precise parameter control resolves the contradiction between preventing precipitation and maintaining storage stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes proper pH adjustment and polyphosphate addition before fertigation begins, creating stable stock solutions that resist precipitation during storage. This preliminary action ensures the system is pre-conditioned to avoid precipitation issues during subsequent use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If intensive mixing conditions are applied, then solubility is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolubility of ironVSAvoidmixing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical environment (pH and polyphosphate concentration) to a state where iron remains soluble without requiring intensive mechanical mixing. The chemical parameters are adjusted so that precipitation is thermodynamically unfavorable, eliminating the need for complex mixing devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively prevents precipitation and maintains storage stability of iron solutions, ensuring high iron yield and robustness in fertigation systems despite pH fluctuations and concentration variations, thereby avoiding iron deficiencies and clogging issues.

Implementation Method 1

a provision of a series of stock solutions comprising a stock solution comprising iron and at least one polyphosphate, at basic pH or at pH between 4.5 and 6.2, advantageously greater than or equal to 5.0 and less or equal to 6.0, preferably a pH greater than or equal to 5.5, formed by adding iron and at least one polyphosphate to an aqueous phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectpH adjustment:

Implementation Method 2

A phenomenon of chemical precipitation appears very often during the step of feeding the stock solution containing said source of iron into the irrigation solution. The solid phase formed, which consists mainly of calcium phosphate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 3

sufficiently intensive mixing conditions at a point of supply of said stock solution in said dilution system are provided so that said fertigation solution has a pH below 6.2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing: Stirring

Data Source

PatentEP3307697B1Process for processing an inorganic, nutritive iron composition
Publication Date: 2021.02.17 PRAYON SA
  • EP3307697B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3307697B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3307697B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A process for fertigation of plants, which comprises forming a series of stock solutions, feeding each of the stock solutions into a diluting system, so as to form a fertigation solution, feeding a fertigation device by means of a transfer device, feeding said fertigation device with said fertigation solution, and adding iron and at least one polyphosphate.