Iron-Based Core-Shell Nanoparticles With Shell-Enhanced Coercivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current permanent magnets rely on rare earth elements, which are scarce, expensive, and environmentally harmful to mine, and are difficult to manufacture, particularly the Fe 16 N 2 phase with high magnetic anisotropy and saturation magnetization.

Innovation Solution

The development of core-shell nanoparticles with an iron-based core, such as Fe 16 N 2, and a non-magnetic, anti-ferromagnetic, or ferrimagnetic shell, which enhances coercivity through strain, exchange, magnetocrystalline, and shape anisotropies, and can be formed using techniques like immersion in a salt composition or milling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If rare earth elements (neodymium) are used in permanent magnets, then high energy product is achieved, but supply availability and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy productVSAvoidsupply availability of rare earth elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by replacing rare earth elements with iron-based compounds (Fe16N2, Fe8N phases) that have different magnetic properties. By adjusting nitrogen content and heat treatment parameters, the iron-based magnets achieve high energy product comparable to rare earth magnets while eliminating supply availability concerns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes expensive rare earth elements with inexpensive iron and nitrogen, which are abundant and widely available. The iron-based nanoparticles provide the necessary magnetic properties at lower cost without relying on scarce strategic materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Use of energy by moving object

If rare earth elements are used in permanent magnets, then high energy product is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy productVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes material composition from rare earth-based to iron-based (Fe16N2/Fe8N phases) and optimizes processing parameters including low-temperature heat treatment (below 500°C) and controlled nitrogen infiltration, resulting in reduced manufacturing cost while maintaining high energy product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive rare earth elements with cheap iron and nitrogen materials. The simplified composition eliminates the need for costly rare earth mining, processing, and handling operations, significantly reducing overall manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Use of energy by moving object

If rare earth elements are used in permanent magnets, then high energy product is achieved, but environmental deterioration occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy productVSAvoidenvironmental deterioration from mining
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material system from rare earth-based to iron-based (Fe16N2/Fe8N phases), eliminating the need for environmentally harmful rare earth mining operations. The new material composition achieves comparable energy product without the associated environmental damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates rare earth elements from the magnetic material composition, replacing them with iron-based compounds. This extraction removes the source of environmental deterioration associated with rare earth mining while preserving the essential magnetic functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Use of energy by moving object

If Fe16N2 phase is manufactured using conventional methods, then high magnetic anisotropy and saturation magnetization are achieved, but manufacturing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic anisotropy constant and saturation magnetizationVSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the Fe16N2 phase formation into controlled stages: first forming iron nanoparticles, then infiltrating with nitrogen source, and finally applying low-temperature heat treatment. This segmentation simplifies the manufacturing process compared to conventional high-temperature sintering methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameters by using low-temperature heat treatment (below 500°C) instead of conventional high-temperature sintering (>1000°C). This parameter change reduces manufacturing difficulty while achieving the desired Fe16N2 phase with high magnetic anisotropy and saturation magnetization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These core-shell nanoparticles achieve magnetic properties comparable to or exceeding those of rare-earth magnets, including high coercivity and energy product, without using rare earth elements, thus addressing supply and environmental concerns.

Implementation Method 1

enhances coercivity through strain, exchange, magnetocrystalline, and shape anisotropies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain anisotropy:

Implementation Method 2

enhances coercivity through strain, exchange, magnetocrystalline, and shape anisotropies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExchange anisotropy:

Implementation Method 3

enhances coercivity through strain, exchange, magnetocrystalline, and shape anisotropies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetocrystalline anisotropy:

Implementation Method 4

enhances coercivity through strain, exchange, magnetocrystalline, and shape anisotropies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShape anisotropy:

Implementation Method 5

annealing a material including iron and nitrogen in the presence of an applied magnetic field to form at least one Fe 16 N 2 phase domain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnnealing: Annealing

Implementation Method 6

annealing a material including iron and nitrogen in the presence of an applied magnetic field to form at least one Fe 16 N 2 phase domain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP4216238B1Iron-based nanoparticles and grains
Publication Date: 2025.05.21 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
  • EP4216238B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~3
  • EP4216238B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP4216238B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

Example nanoparticles may include an iron-based core, and a shell. The shell may include a non-magnetic, anti-ferromagnetic, or ferrimagnetic material. Example alloy compositions may include an iron-based grain, and a grain boundary. The grain boundary may include a non-magnetic, anti-ferromagnetic, or ferrimagnetic material. Example techniques for forming iron-based core-shell nanoparticles may include depositing a shell on an iron-based core. The depositing may include immersing the iron-based core in a salt composition for a predetermined period of time. The depositing may include milling the iron-based core with a salt composition for a predetermined period of time. Example techniques for treating a composition comprising core-shell nanoparticles may include nitriding the composition.