Iron-Sulfide Redox Flow Battery Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing redox flow batteries face issues with unstable redox species, high oxidative properties, precipitation, and the use of volatile gases, leading to increased complexity and cost due to restrictive operating conditions and expensive materials.

Innovation Solution

Iron-sulfide redox flow battery systems using Fe(III) and Fe(II) in a positive electrolyte and S2− and S in a negative electrolyte, with a sulfonate tetrafluoroethylene-based fluoropolymer or hydrocarbon membrane, and carbon electrodes with optional catalysts, operating in a basic pH environment for improved stability and cost-effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional redox species are used in redox flow batteries, then energy storage function is achieved, but the system suffers from instability, high oxidative properties, precipitation, and volatile gas generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of redox speciesVSAvoidoxidative properties, precipitation, volatile gases
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters by selecting iron-sulfide redox couples with appropriate standard potentials, operating at controlled temperatures (25-60°C), and maintaining specific pH ranges to prevent precipitation and stabilize the redox species in solution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts potentially harmful precipitation of iron sulfides into a beneficial feature by designing the system to operate with controlled solubility products, where the precipitation tendency is managed through pH control and concentration optimization to maintain stable operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If restrictive operating conditions and expensive materials are imposed to address disadvantages, then system stability improves, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of operating conditions and materials
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs iron and sulfur compounds that are abundant, inexpensive, and environmentally benign, eliminating the need for expensive vanadium-based systems or complex protective measures, while the basic electrolyte solution self-regulates to prevent corrosion of battery components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent operates at near-ambient temperatures (25-60°C) and uses basic pH electrolytes, eliminating the need for expensive heating/cooling systems and corrosion-resistant materials required by acidic systems, thereby reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If vanadium-based redox couples are used, then some ad hoc approaches are eliminated, but highly acidic solutions and expensive materials are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of system designVSAvoidacidic solutions, expensive materials
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using acidic electrolytes as in vanadium systems, the patent inverts the approach by using basic pH electrolytes with iron-sulfide redox couples, achieving similar simplification benefits while avoiding the harmful effects of acidity and expensive materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Demonstrates high energy conversion efficiency and stability with low-cost, environmentally friendly materials, achieving columbic efficiency over 93% and energy efficiency above 75% in charge-discharge cycles.

Implementation Method 1

A redox flow battery (RFB) stores electrical energy in reduced and oxidized species dissolved in two separate electrolyte solutions. The negative electrolyte and the positive electrolyte circulate through cell electrodes separated by an ion exchange membrane or a separator.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

The negative electrolyte and the positive electrolyte circulate through cell electrodes separated by an ion exchange membrane or a separator.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon exchange: Ion Exchange

Data Source

PatentUS9368824B2Iron-sulfide redox flow batteries
Publication Date: 2016.06.14 BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST
  • US9368824B2 patent drawing
  • US9368824B2 patent drawing
  • US9368824B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Iron-sulfide redox flow battery (RFB) systems can be advantageous for energy storage, particularly when the electrolytes have pH values greater than 6. Such systems can exhibit excellent energy conversion efficiency and stability and can utilize low-cost materials that are relatively safer and more environmentally friendly. One example of an iron-sulfide RFB is characterized by a positive electrolyte that comprises Fe(III) and/or Fe(II) in a positive electrolyte supporting solution, a negative electrolyte that comprises S2− and/or S in a negative electrolyte supporting solution, and a membrane, or a separator, that separates the positive electrolyte and electrode from the negative electrolyte and electrode.