Cyclic Marine Seismic Sources Using Irregular Shot Intervals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional marine seismic surveys face challenges in efficiently separating source energy reflections due to strict timing constraints between source activations, particularly in simultaneous shooting techniques and 4D surveys, which can lead to suboptimal data collection and resolution.

Innovation Solution

Implementing cyclic source groups with irregular nominal shot point intervals and sequential activation cycles, allowing for improved deblending and increased fold and sampling density by exploiting orthogonality in source energy propagation, while maintaining common midpoint coverage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If strict timing constraints are used between source activations, then source energy reflections can be separated, but data collection efficiency and resolution are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation of source energy reflectionsVSAvoiddata collection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from fixed, regular shot point intervals to variable, irregular intervals. The system dynamically adjusts the timing between source activations based on the specific survey configuration and geological targets, allowing optimization of both reflection separation and data collection efficiency. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by enabling flexible timing that serves multiple objectives simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of shot point interval from a constant value to a variable parameter that can be irregularly spaced. By allowing the time interval between shots to vary within certain constraints, the system can improve both the separation of reflections and the overall data collection efficiency, resolving the trade-off between precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If regular nominal shot point intervals are used, then timing constraints are simplified, but deblending performance and sampling density are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming constraint simplificationVSAvoiddeblending performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by introducing irregular shot point intervals that break the symmetry of regular timing patterns. This asymmetric timing arrangement improves deblending performance by creating more distinct temporal signatures for different source activations, while the system manages the added complexity through controlled variation within defined constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses periodic action through cyclic source group activations that repeat in a systematic manner. Even though the intervals within each cycle may be irregular, the overall periodic repetition provides a structured framework that simplifies timing management while enabling improved deblending through the predictable cyclic pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If simultaneous shooting techniques are used, then survey efficiency is improved, but separation of source energy reflections becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey efficiencyVSAvoidseparation of source energy reflections
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the source group into multiple cyclic source groups, each with its own activation cycle. This segmentation allows simultaneous shooting to maintain high survey efficiency while the cyclic structure enables systematic separation of source energy reflections through temporal ordering within each cycle, resolving the contradiction between efficiency and separation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamics by implementing variable shot point intervals within the simultaneous shooting framework. This dynamic timing approach allows the system to maintain the efficiency benefits of simultaneous shooting while creating sufficient temporal distinction between source activations to enable effective reflection separation through the irregular interval pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If 4D surveys are performed, then monitoring capability is enhanced, but timing constraints and data processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring capabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action through cyclic source group activations that provide a structured, repeating timing pattern for 4D surveys. This periodic structure enhances monitoring capability by enabling consistent repeated measurements over time, while the cyclic pattern simplifies data processing complexity through predictable temporal relationships between successive surveys.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by implementing irregular shot point intervals that can be adapted between different 4D survey cycles. This flexibility allows optimization of monitoring capability for specific geological conditions while managing data processing complexity through controlled parameter variation rather than complete redesign of the acquisition system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances data collection efficiency and resolution by reducing strict timing constraints, enabling more effective separation of source energy reflections and improving image quality in marine seismic surveys.

Implementation Method 1

When activated, each air gun in the array releases a sudden burst of compressed air, which generates a pressure wave in the water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic wave generation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

acoustic energy that propagates from the source location toward reflectors disposed beneath the water bottom while reflected energy is recorded by a set of geophysical sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20250271586A1Irregular Nominal Shot Point Intervals for Cyclic Source Groups in Marine Seismic Surveys
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS
  • US20250271586A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271586A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271586A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A cyclic source group for marine seismic surveying includes a set of three or more impulsive marine seismic sources and at least one controller configured to activate the sources in sequential activation cycles. The activation cycles are such that exactly one nominal shot point occurs for each of the sources in the set during each activation cycle and all nominal shot points within a given activation cycle are distinct. Pairs of sequential nominal shot points within the activation cycle and across sequential activation cycles define respective nominal shot point intervals. At least two of the nominal shot point intervals are unequal, but nominal shot points for each individual source in the set occur at regular intervals.