Irrigation Calibration Map for Flow Rate Variations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural irrigation systems fail to accurately deliver prescribed amounts of water due to variations in water flow rates caused by field elevation changes, pipe friction losses, water emitter nozzle wear, and pressure-regulator inaccuracies, leading to over or under-watering of crops.

Innovation Solution

A calibration system that creates a map of flow rate variations by measuring actual flow rates and comparing them to expected rates, generating correction factors to adjust operational aspects of the irrigation system, such as mobile tower speed and water emitter duty cycles, to compensate for these variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If irrigation plans are created based on expected flow rates at flat ground, then the system can operate with simple initial settings, but the water delivery becomes inaccurate when field elevation changes occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of initial system setupVSAvoidwater delivery accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration by moving the irrigation system across the field and measuring actual flow rates at various locations before creating the irrigation plan. This preliminary action captures elevation changes and friction losses, storing correction factors that will be applied during actual irrigation operations to maintain accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (tower speed, emitter duty cycle) based on location-specific correction factors stored in the calibration map. Instead of using fixed parameters throughout the field, the system dynamically adjusts parameters to compensate for elevation and friction variations at each location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If the irrigation system operates without calibration adjustments, then the system structure remains simple, but water flow rate variations cause over or under-watering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structural complexityVSAvoidwater delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses flow rate measurements taken during calibration as feedback to determine correction factors for different field locations. These correction factors are stored and applied during irrigation operations, creating a feedback loop that ensures reliable water delivery despite variations in elevation and friction losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The irrigation system performs self-calibration by measuring its own flow rates at various locations and generating its own correction factors. This self-service approach allows the system to compensate for its own performance variations without requiring external calibration equipment or complex additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If irrigation plans are created when the system is first placed into service, then initial water delivery can be accurate, but accuracy decreases over time as components age

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for irrigation plan creationVSAvoidwater delivery accuracy over time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs calibration periodically rather than only once at installation. The calibration map can be updated at scheduled intervals or when performance degradation is detected, ensuring that correction factors remain accurate as components age and performance characteristics change over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Measurement precision

If the system adjusts operational parameters to compensate for flow rate variations, then water delivery accuracy improves, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater delivery accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different correction factors to different locations in the field based on locally measured flow rates. Each location receives customized operational parameters (tower speed, emitter duty cycle) tailored to its specific elevation and friction characteristics, rather than using uniform parameters across the entire field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10827692B2System and method for calibrating an irrigation system
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 LINDSAY CORP
  • US10827692B2 patent drawing
  • US10827692B2 patent drawing
  • US10827692B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for calibrating an irrigation system to account for variations in flow rates caused by field elevation changes, pipe friction losses, water emitter nozzle wear, pressure-regulator inaccuracies, and other factors. A calibration map is created to account for the flow rate variations and then consulted to control operation of the irrigation system.