Irrigation Control System Drag-and-Drop Interface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing irrigation control systems for low-volume irrigation systems are cumbersome and require complex programming, often necessitating manual operation and lacking intuitive remote access, making it difficult for users to efficiently manage and optimize water usage.

Innovation Solution

A control system comprising valve controllers, an irrigation system controller, and a remotely accessible graphical user interface that allows users to create, modify, and implement irrigation plans through an intuitive drag-and-drop interface, simplifying the process of managing irrigation zones, sets, and special actions, enabling efficient scheduling and operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual control of irrigation valves is used, then the system is simple and reliable, but the operation is tedious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of valve operationVSAvoidtime for manual control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The irrigation system performs self-service through automated control. The controller automatically opens and closes valves according to pre-programmed irrigation schedules without requiring user intervention. The system monitors its own operation status and executes irrigation tasks autonomously, eliminating the need for manual valve operation while maintaining reliable performance through built-in control logic and timing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical valve operation with an automated control system. The controller uses electrical or electronic signals to actuate valves, substituting the mechanical hand-wrench operation with automated motorized or solenoid-driven valve control. This substitution eliminates the need for physical manual intervention while maintaining precise control over irrigation timing and duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated control systems are implemented, then operation efficiency is improved, but the programming and controls become confusing and non-intuitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation efficiencyVSAvoidease of programming
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The controller creates and stores copies of irrigation programs in its memory. Multiple irrigation schedules, valve sequences, and timing parameters are replicated and saved as reusable program templates. Users can copy existing programs, modify them as needed, and store multiple versions, eliminating the need to re-program from scratch and simplifying the programming process while maintaining high operational efficiency through automated execution of these stored program copies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-programming irrigation schedules, valve sequences, and timing parameters before the actual irrigation execution. All control logic, timing sequences, and operational parameters are prepared in advance and stored in the controller's memory, allowing the system to automatically execute complex irrigation patterns without requiring users to program during the actual irrigation operation. This preliminary programming approach simplifies user interaction while enabling sophisticated automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If control systems are mounted locally in panels, then the controller is accessible for setup, but remote access and adjustment are not available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of local accessVSAvoidremote accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed with multi-functionality to serve both local and remote operation modes. It includes a local user interface for direct programming and monitoring at the control panel, while simultaneously incorporating remote communication capabilities through wireless or wired connections to mobile devices, computers, or other remote terminals. This universal design allows the same controller to fulfill multiple functions: local setup and adjustment, remote monitoring, and even remote program modification, eliminating the need for separate local and remote control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10368506B2Control system for an irrigation system
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 LINDSAY CORP
  • US10368506B2 patent drawing
  • US10368506B2 patent drawing
  • US10368506B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for a low-volume irrigation system includes a plurality of valve controllers for opening and closing valves; an irrigation system controller for controlling the valve controllers in accordance with an irrigation plan; and a graphical user interface for allowing a user to interact with the irrigation controller and to create the irrigation plan. The graphical user interface displays an irrigation zone list, an irrigation set list, and an irrigation plan field. The user interface has drag and drop functionality that permits an irrigation zone listing from the irrigation zone list to be dragged and dropped into any of the irrigation set listings in the irrigation set list and that permits an irrigation zone listing or an irrigation set listing to be dragged and dropped into the irrigation plan to create irrigation steps within the irrigation plan.