Irrigation Controller Automatic Watering Restriction Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex watering restrictions imposed by water districts require frequent re-programming of irrigation controllers, which is tedious and often beyond the technical skills of homeowners, leading to compliance challenges and potential fines for non-compliance.

Innovation Solution

An irrigation controller with a processor and manually actuable controls that allows users to select and implement predetermined watering restrictions, automatically disabling portions of the watering program to comply with changing seasonal restrictions, using a memory to store and execute watering programs and restrictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional irrigation controllers are used with complex watering restrictions, then compliance with water district regulations can be achieved, but frequent re-programming is required which is tedious and beyond the technical skills of most homeowners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with watering restrictionsVSAvoidre-programming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The irrigation controller automatically monitors compliance with watering restrictions and self-adjusts the watering program without requiring user re-programming. The system uses a compliance flag stored in memory to track whether current watering operations would violate restrictions, and automatically modifies valve operation timing to maintain compliance while preserving the original watering schedule intent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates compliance status before executing watering operations. By evaluating the watering program against restriction criteria in advance and setting compliance flags beforehand, the controller prevents non-compliant watering from occurring rather than requiring reactive re-programming after violations are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If homeowners re-program irrigation controllers frequently to comply with changing seasonal restrictions, then compliance can be maintained, but this requires technical skills and time that most homeowners do not have

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to seasonal restrictionsVSAvoidre-programming time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller automatically adapts to changing seasonal watering restrictions by continuously monitoring compliance conditions and self-modifying the watering program. The system eliminates the need for manual re-programming by using its processor to evaluate restriction compliance and automatically adjust valve timing, thereby adapting to seasonal changes without user intervention or time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The irrigation controller dynamically adjusts its operation based on real-time compliance evaluation. The system continuously monitors whether current watering operations would violate restrictions and dynamically modifies the watering schedule parameters, allowing seamless adaptation to changing seasonal restrictions without static re-programming requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If irrigation controllers automatically adjust watering schedules, then compliance with complex restrictions is easier to achieve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance managementVSAvoidcontroller programming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The irrigation controller integrates multiple functions into a single device: it executes the user-defined watering program, monitors compliance with water district restrictions, stores compliance status in memory, and automatically adjusts valve timing when violations are detected. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate manual programming and monitoring activities into one automated system, easing operation despite increased internal complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance flag stored in memory acts as an intermediary between the watering program execution and the valve control. Rather than directly complexly processing restriction rules, the system uses this intermediate compliance indicator to trigger automatic adjustments, simplifying the control logic while maintaining the ability to handle complex seasonal restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8700222B1Irrigation controller with selectable watering restrictions
Publication Date: 2014.04.15 HUNTER INDUSTRIES INC
  • US8700222B1 patent drawing
  • US8700222B1 patent drawing
  • US8700222B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An irrigation controller includes a processor and a memory that either forms a part of the processor or is connected to the processor. A plurality of manually actuable controls allow a user to enter a watering program into the memory or select a watering program stored in the memory. Circuitry is controlled by the processor for turning corresponding valves ON and OFF in accordance with the watering program. Programming stored in the memory implements predetermined watering restrictions that disable portions of the watering otherwise effectuated by the watering program.