Irrigation Drive Anomaly Detection Using Power and Current Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Irrigation systems frequently break down during critical growing periods, leading to delays and increased costs, as existing technologies only notify of failures after they occur, lacking predictive maintenance capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A predictive maintenance system that uses sensors to collect data on real-time operational parameters, combining logic-based algorithms with external data sources like weather and soil moisture to anticipate maintenance needs, employing machine learning models to predict potential issues before they cause downtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional breakdown detection methods are used, then the system can identify failures after they occur, but the system experiences delays and increased costs during critical growing periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoiddowntime during critical growing periods
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring operational parameters (power consumption, current, voltage, reactive power) and using machine learning models to predict potential failures before they occur. This allows maintenance to be scheduled in advance, preventing breakdowns during critical growing periods and eliminating the reactive nature of traditional detection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data from operational parameters is constantly collected, analyzed by machine learning models, and used to update predictions about system health. This real-time feedback enables the system to detect early signs of deterioration and alert operators before actual breakdowns occur, thereby improving reliability while minimizing unplanned downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If predictive maintenance capabilities are added to the system, then downtime and costs can be reduced, but the device complexity increases with additional sensors and algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedowntime reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity with sensors and algorithms
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies universality by using multi-functional sensors that monitor multiple operational parameters (power, current, voltage, reactive power) simultaneously. The machine learning models are designed to handle various types of data inputs and predict different failure modes, reducing the need for separate dedicated sensors and analysis systems for each parameter, thereby managing complexity while achieving comprehensive predictive maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through autonomous machine learning models that automatically analyze sensor data, detect anomalies, and generate maintenance predictions without requiring constant human intervention. The system self-calibrates and adapts to normal operational patterns, reducing the complexity burden on operators while providing robust predictive maintenance capabilities that minimize downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If machine learning models are used to predict maintenance needs, then potential issues can be identified before they become critical, but the extent of automation increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive maintenance accuracyVSAvoidautomation level with machine learning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual monitoring and diagnostic mechanisms with automated machine learning models that process sensor data and predict failures. This substitution of mechanical/human inspection methods with intelligent algorithms improves predictive accuracy while managing automation complexity through the use of interpretable models that provide clear maintenance recommendations rather than opaque automated decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4272040B1Determining drive system anomalies based on power and/or current changes in an irrigation system
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 HEARTLAND AG TECH INC
  • EP4272040B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4272040B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4272040B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A predictive maintenance system for an irrigation system includes one or more sensors configured to generate a signal indicative of abnormal operation within the irrigation system, the sensors electrically coupled to a drive system, a processor, and a memory. The memory includes instructions stored thereon, which when executed by the processor cause the predictive maintenance system to receive the generated signal, determine abnormal operation of the drive system based on the generated signal, and predict, by a machine learning model, a maintenance requirement of the drive system based on the determined abnormal operation.