Irrigation Pipe Blowout Detection via Bubble Trapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to detect micro perforations in irrigation pipes during manufacturing, leading to undetected blowouts that cause production line shutdowns and costly field repairs after they manifest as leaks in irrigation projects.

Innovation Solution

A method involving differential air pressure between the pipes and a vacuum tank filled with cooling liquid to create bubbles at defects, which are captured and detected by a sensor, triggering an alert to stop production or alert operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual inspection or simple sensors are used to detect holes in irrigation pipes, then large holes can be detected, but micro perforations remain undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary substance (air or gas) that flows through the pipe and escapes as bubbles through any perforations, even micro-sized ones. This intermediary converts the invisible micro-defect into visible bubbles that can be detected by simple optical sensors, thereby achieving high detection precision without requiring complex inspection equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from direct visual inspection of the pipe wall to observation of bubble formation and escape patterns. By monitoring parameters such as bubble frequency, size, and flow rate, the system can detect micro-perforations that would be invisible through conventional inspection methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If micro perforations are not detected during manufacturing, then production continues without interruption, but the pipes cause failures and require costly field repairs after installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction continuityVSAvoidpipe quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary detection of micro-perforations during the manufacturing process itself, before the pipes are installed. By detecting and flagging defective pipes at the production stage, the system prevents defective pipes from reaching the field, thereby ensuring reliability without interrupting the overall production flow - only defective pipes are removed, not the entire production line

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback loop where detection results from the bubble flow test immediately inform the production process. Pipes that show abnormal bubble patterns are automatically identified and removed from the production line, providing real-time feedback that ensures only high-quality pipes proceed to packaging and shipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the vacuum tank is filled with cooling liquid to create negative pressure, then bubbles from blowouts are generated and can be detected, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblowout detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the vacuum tank serve multiple functions: it acts as both a cooling chamber for the extruded pipe and a detection chamber for bubble generation. The cooling liquid in the tank simultaneously cools the pipe and provides the negative pressure environment needed for bubble formation, thereby reducing overall system complexity despite the sophisticated detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the cooling process and the detection process into a single integrated operation. The same vacuum tank and cooling liquid that are necessary for pipe cooling also create the conditions for bubble generation and detection, combining two essential functions into one unified system rather than requiring separate cooling and detection systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time detection of blowouts during manufacturing, preventing undetected leaks and reducing warranty claims by identifying micro perforations before they cause significant issues.

Implementation Method 1

differential air pressure between the pipes and a vacuum tank filled with cooling liquid to create bubbles at defects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

negative pressure of the vacuum tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentEP3060896B1Method and system for detection of blowout in pipes/tubes
Publication Date: 2019.03.13 JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
  • EP3060896B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3060896B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for detecting a blowout in an irrigation pipe. The irrigation pipe is extruded. Further a positive air pressure may be created by circulating air through the irrigation pipe. The irrigation pipe with positive air pressure is then fed into a tank, wherein the tank comprises a coolant liquid. Further at least one air bubble is trapped at a surface of the tank.