Adaptive Irrigation Valve Sequencing for Pressure and Flow Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional irrigation systems face inefficiencies and damage due to poorly controlled valve operations, leading to inadequate water distribution, prolonged watering times, and potential system damage from water hammer, as they fail to adapt to dynamic changes in pressure and flow rate caused by varying pipe diameters and unscheduled water usage by non-irrigation equipment.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic control system that monitors pressure and flow rate to adjust valve operations, predicting behavior and timing changes to maintain pressure and flow within target ranges, using data profiles to optimize valve activation and deactivation, and accounting for recovery times to prevent system damage and ensure efficient water use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional irrigation systems operate valves without adaptive control, then the system structure remains simple, but water distribution efficiency deteriorates and system damage occurs from water hammer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater distribution efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The irrigation control system dynamically adjusts valve operations based on real-time pressure and flow rate measurements. The controller continuously monitors system conditions and adapts valve timing and sequencing to maintain optimal water distribution efficiency while preventing water hammer damage, transforming a static control approach into a dynamic responsive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback control by measuring actual pressure and flow rate during irrigation operations, comparing these measurements against target ranges, and using this information to adjust subsequent valve operations. This feedback mechanism enables the system to self-correct and maintain efficient water distribution while preventing system damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple valves are activated simultaneously to maximize water usage, then water distribution speed increases, but pressure drops and system damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater usage efficiencyVSAvoidsystem damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller calculates and schedules valve activation sequences in advance, determining the optimal timing for each valve based on predicted pressure and flow rate changes. By pre-planning valve operations rather than activating them simultaneously, the system maximizes water usage efficiency while maintaining pressure within safe operating limits to prevent water hammer damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic valve activation patterns rather than simultaneous operation. Valves are opened and closed in a sequenced manner with specific time intervals between activations, allowing pressure to stabilize between events. This periodic action maintains high water usage efficiency while preventing pressure drops that could cause system damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If valve operations are delayed to prevent water hammer, then system reliability improves, but watering time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem protection from water hammerVSAvoidwatering completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters including valve timing, duration, and sequencing based on real-time pressure and flow rate conditions. By adjusting these parameters adaptively rather than using fixed delayed intervals, the system protects against water hammer while minimizing extensions to the overall watering schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The controller applies partial delays to specific valve operations rather than uniformly delaying all valve activations. By selectively timing individual valve operations based on their specific impact on pressure and flow rate, the system provides adequate protection from water hammer while minimizing the total watering time extension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If the system adapts to unscheduled water usage by non-irrigation equipment, then water distribution efficiency improves, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive water distributionVSAvoidmonitoring and control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs multiple functions using the same sensor and controller infrastructure: it monitors pressure and flow rate for both irrigation control and detection of unscheduled water usage by non-irrigation equipment. This multi-functionality enables adaptive response to various system conditions without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects and responds to unscheduled water usage events without requiring separate monitoring systems or manual intervention. When pressure and flow rate patterns indicate non-irrigation water usage, the controller self-adjusts valve operations to maintain efficient water distribution, enabling the system to serve itself in adapting to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11112764B2Systems, methods, and apparatuses for adaptive irrigation zone control using pressure, time, flow, and predicted behavior
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 HYDROPOINT DATA SYSTEMS INC
  • US11112764B2 patent drawing
  • US11112764B2 patent drawing
  • US11112764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adaptive hydraulic control system controls irrigation system zones using predicted valve behavior, measured pressure, recovery time, and measured flow. A pressure sensor can measure a pressure in a water line and a flow meter can measure a flow rate in the water line. The adaptive hydraulic control system monitors the pressure and the flow rate, and determines when the pressure and the flow rate are above and below target operational thresholds. When the pressure is determined to be below a minimum target threshold or the flow rate is determined to be above a maximum target threshold, the adaptive hydraulic control system identifies one or more valves in an opened position of the plurality of valves that when closed would cause the pressure and the flow rate to return within the target operational thresholds. The adaptive hydraulic control system provides instructions to change a position of the one or more identified valves.