ISA Speed Policy Profiling for Dynamic Fleet Driving Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fleet vehicle speed control systems use a single speed policy across an organization, failing to account for varying driving instances, which can lead to inefficiencies and potential safety issues.

Innovation Solution

An automated method that identifies parameters of a driving instance, applies a predetermined speed policy based on these parameters, and updates the policy in real-time as conditions change, using an intelligent speed adaptation system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single speed policy is used across the entire vehicle fleet, then the speed control system is simple to implement, but it cannot adapt to varying driving conditions and instances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to driving conditionsVSAvoidspeed control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the unified speed policy into multiple instance-specific speed policies, where each driving instance (vehicle, driver, route, time) has its own tailored speed policy. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to varying driving conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through modular policy structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts speed policies based on real-time driving instance parameters. Rather than using a static single policy, the system continuously evaluates driving conditions and applies appropriate speed policies, making the speed control system adaptive and responsive to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple speed policies are implemented for different driving instances, then safety and efficiency are improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidspeed control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor driving instance parameters and adjust speed policies accordingly. This feedback loop ensures safety by responding to actual driving conditions while managing complexity through automated decision-making algorithms that learn from accumulated data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters (speed limits, enforcement strictness) based on driving instance characteristics. By adjusting parameters rather than creating entirely separate control systems, the patent achieves multiple speed policies with reduced overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If real-time updates of speed policy are performed based on changing parameters, then responsiveness to driving conditions is improved, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresponsivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining multiple speed policies and their associated parameter thresholds before real-time operation. During actual driving, the system only needs to evaluate which pre-defined policy matches current conditions, significantly reducing real-time computational requirements while maintaining high responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260028031A1Using isa system to implement a speed policy identified based on profile of a driving instance
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 7980302 CANADA
  • US20260028031A1 patent drawing
  • US20260028031A1 patent drawing
  • US20260028031A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated method of controlling a speed of a vehicle includes identifying parameters of a driving instance of the vehicle; identifying a predetermined profile that is applicable to the driving instance based on the identified parameters; identifying a predetermined speed policy applicable to the driving instance based on the identified profile; and implementing the identified speed policy during the driving instance. The method may be repeated during the driving instance, whereby the speed policy that is implemented is automatically updated when one or more changes in the identified parameters cause a different predetermined speed policy to be identified. Parameter may include driver parameters (e.g., driver age and driver experience); vehicle parameters (e.g., vehicle age, mileage, and tire wear) tire maintenance information); behavior parameters (e.g., speed, acceleration, hard braking of the vehicle, following distance, swerving, and cornering); and circumstance parameters (e.g., time of day, road information, inclement weather, and traffic congestion).