Islanding Detection Using Voltage Harmonics and Unbalance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current islanding detection methods in electricity distribution networks face challenges such as non-detection zones and nuisance tripping, particularly with passive methods like ROCOF, which are sensitive to network disturbances and require difficult threshold settings.

Innovation Solution

A device and method that concurrently monitor islanding and network events, using parameters like voltage total harmonic distortion and voltage unbalance to improve detection reliability and selectivity, avoiding nuisance tripping by associating islanding conditions with network faults or events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If ROCOF-based passive detection method is used, then islanding detection speed is improved, but nuisance tripping increases due to sensitivity to network disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveislanding detection speedVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple detection parameters (frequency, voltage, power, impedance) into a unified islanding detection scheme. Instead of relying solely on ROCOF, the system merges multiple measurements to achieve both fast detection and high reliability by cross-validating signals from different parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection device performs multiple functions simultaneously: it monitors frequency for fast response, voltage for stability assessment, power for balance detection, and impedance for network condition evaluation. This multi-functional approach allows the single device to achieve both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If detection threshold is reduced to minimize non-detection zone, then detection sensitivity is improved, but nuisance tripping increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidnuisance tripping
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts detection thresholds based on network conditions rather than using fixed low thresholds. By changing the threshold parameters adaptively according to system state, the detection maintains high sensitivity when needed while avoiding nuisance tripping during normal disturbances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from multiple parameter measurements to validate detection signals before triggering tripping. The feedback mechanism cross-checks multiple parameters to confirm islanding conditions, ensuring high detection sensitivity while filtering out false signals that would cause nuisance tripping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If communication-based LOM detection is used, then non-detection zone is eliminated, but system complexity and cost increase due to high-speed communication requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection device performs self-diagnosis and self-validation using local measurements of frequency, voltage, power, and impedance. Instead of requiring external communication infrastructure, the device uses its own multiple sensors to cross-validate islanding detection, achieving high reliability through self-sufficient multi-parameter monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multiple measurement parameters as intermediaries between the physical islanding condition and the detection decision. These intermediate parameters (voltage, power, impedance) serve as mediators that provide additional validation layers, eliminating the need for complex communication-based validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If active local detection methods are used, then islanding detection capability is improved, but network disturbances increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveislanding detection capabilityVSAvoidnetwork disturbances
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of actively injecting test signals into the network, the patent inverts the approach by passively monitoring multiple natural network parameters (frequency, voltage, power, impedance) that change during islanding. This passive multi-parameter monitoring achieves detection capability without generating network disturbances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS9784781B2Islanding detection reliability in electricity distribution network
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US9784781B2 patent drawing
  • US9784781B2 patent drawing
  • US9784781B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for detecting an islanding condition in an electricity distribution network. The device comprises means for concurrently monitoring an islanding condition and a network event condition in the electricity distribution network, means for detecting an islanding condition in the power system network, and means for determining on the validity of detection of the islanding condition based on whether there is an associated network event with the detected islanding condition.