Isomerization Fractionation Column Integration for High-Octane Gasoline

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current isomerization processes for producing high-octane gasoline are inefficient in terms of yield and octane number, and incur high investment and operating costs due to the need for separate separation of isopentane and n-pentane, which complicates the fractionation process.

Innovation Solution

A process that includes a catalytic isomerization section followed by stabilization and successive separation of iso-pentane, n-pentane, and branched C6 compounds, with optional simultaneous separation in a single column, reducing the need for separate de-isopentanizer and de-pentanizer columns and optimizing the fractionation conditions to enhance octane number and reduce energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If separate de-isopentanizer and de-pentanizer columns are used to separate isopentane and n-pentane, then separation precision is improved, but device complexity and investment costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of de-isopentanizer and de-pentanizer columns into a single integrated fractionation system. The first separation column performs both de-isopentanization and de-pentanization operations, eliminating the need for two separate columns while maintaining effective separation of isopentane and n-pentane through optimized tray configurations and operating parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The first separation column is designed to perform multiple functions: it acts as both a de-isopentanizer (removing isopentane) and a de-pentanizer (removing n-pentane). This multi-functional column handles the separation of multiple hydrocarbon components in a single unit, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining separation precision through optimized internal structures and operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple separate separation columns are used for fractionation, then manufacturing precision is improved, but operating costs and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefractionation precisionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separation functions into fewer columns, reducing the total number of reboilers and condensers that consume energy. The integrated first separation column consolidates the thermal energy requirements of separate de-isopentanization and de-pentanization processes, leading to lower overall energy consumption while maintaining fractionation precision through optimized tray designs and heat integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If complex column configurations with multiple separation steps are used, then product purity is improved, but productivity decreases due to longer processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary separation of isopentane in the first separation column before the main fractionation process. By removing isopentane early in the process sequence, the subsequent separation steps can focus on n-pentane and other hydrocarbons, reducing the overall number of theoretical stages required and accelerating the total processing time while maintaining high product purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The fractionation process is segmented into distinct functional zones within the first separation column, with specific tray sections dedicated to isopentane removal, n-pentane removal, and heavier hydrocarbon separation. This segmentation allows each zone to operate optimally for its specific separation task, improving overall processing efficiency and reducing total column height and processing time while maintaining high purity products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process improves the yield and octane number of gasoline while reducing energy consumption and operational costs by streamlining the separation steps and eliminating the need for complex column configurations, leading to more efficient production of high-octane fuels.

Implementation Method 1

catalytic isomerization section (1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

stabilization of the reaction effluents (2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 3

first separation stage (3+4) and a second separation stage (5)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFractionation: Fractionation

Data Source

PatentEP3137583B1Petrol production method comprising an isomerisation step followed by at least two separation steps
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 AXENS SA
  • EP3137583B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3137583B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3137583B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for the production of petrol with a high octane rating, by means of isomerisation of a light naphtha fraction, as well as comprising two separation steps performed downstream of the reaction step, which allow the energy efficiency of the method to be improved.