Sensor-Guided Isometric Exercise Positioning for User Fit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exercise equipment lacks the ability to accurately adjust to the size and strength of individual users, requiring manual estimation and potentially leading to improper positioning and muscle strain during isometric exercises.

Innovation Solution

An exercise apparatus with a load-bearing mechanism incorporating an actuator, position sensor, and force sensor, which adjusts the distance between the loading interface and user support dynamically, providing precise positioning and feedback to ensure safe and effective isometric exercises.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual estimation is used to adjust exercise equipment positioning, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability of user accommodation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated actuator system. The actuator mechanically adjusts the position of the loading interface based on sensor data, eliminating the need for users to manually estimate and adjust positions, thereby improving positioning accuracy without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The exercise equipment performs self-adjustment through automated actuators controlled by sensor feedback. The system automatically determines the correct positioning based on user measurements and adjusts itself without requiring user intervention or manual estimation, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If manual adjustment is used, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to individual user size and strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoiduser accommodation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates force sensors and position sensors that provide real-time feedback about user characteristics and equipment positioning. This feedback loop enables the system to automatically adapt to individual user size and strength by adjusting the loading interface position and resistance levels based on measured data, while requiring minimal user input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static manual adjustment to dynamic automated adjustment. The actuator system can continuously adapt the equipment configuration based on real-time sensor data, allowing the equipment to dynamically accommodate different users and their changing needs during exercise sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If precise positioning is implemented through automated mechanisms, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator system serves multiple functions: it positions the loading interface, maintains tension during exercise, and can be controlled through various interfaces (manual, automated, or hybrid). This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by providing precise positioning and adaptive control capabilities that improve both measurement precision and user accommodation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If force sensors and position sensors are integrated, then reliability of exercise safety and effectiveness is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexercise safetyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force sensors and position sensors provide continuous feedback about user exertion and equipment positioning. This feedback enables the control system to monitor exercise safety in real-time, adjust resistance levels appropriately, and prevent improper positioning that could cause injury, thereby significantly improving exercise safety and effectiveness despite the added sensor complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12485317B2Exercise systems and related methods
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 TRUE WELLNESS INC
  • US12485317B2 patent drawing
  • US12485317B2 patent drawing
  • US12485317B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exercise apparatus and related method according to which the exercise apparatus includes a loading interface, a user support, and a load-bearing mechanism operably coupled between the loading interface and the user support. A load-bearing mechanism adapted to be operably coupled between a loading interface and a user support of an exercise apparatus. The load-bearing mechanism includes an actuator, a position sensor, and a force sensor. A method for adjusting a relative distance between a loading interface and a user support of an exercise apparatus using a load-bearing mechanism to accommodate users of varying size. Exercise systems and related methods according to which a kiosk is in communication with one or more of the following: a grip-strength tester or component(s) thereof; a balance board or component(s) thereof; a vibration system or component(s) thereof; and/or other exercise devices or systems.