Isopentane-Npentane Separation for Catalytic Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional processes for upgrading light alkanes to value-added products are not well-suited for hydrocarbon feed streams primarily comprising pentanes (isopentane and n-pentane), limiting the efficient conversion of pentanes into more valuable products like transportation fuels and chemicals, while also producing undesirable C1-C4 light paraffins.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the separation of isopentane and n-pentane isomers from a feed stream, followed by catalytic activation at optimized temperatures and pressures to maximize the yield of olefins and aromatics, with optional oligomerization or alkylation to produce upgraded products suitable for liquid transportation fuels, minimizing the production of C1-C4 light paraffins.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional processes are used to upgrade light alkanes, then the process is simple and well-established, but the yield of valuable products (olefins and aromatics) is low and C1-C4 light paraffins are produced as undesirable byproducts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of valuable productsVSAvoidproduction of C1-C4 light paraffins
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process separates the pentane feedstock into two distinct streams: an isopentane-enriched stream and an n-pentane-enriched stream. Each stream is then processed through separate catalytic activation units with optimized conditions tailored to each isomer's characteristics. This segmentation allows for maximized yield of valuable olefins and aromatics while minimizing unwanted C1-C4 paraffin production by avoiding the compromises necessary in mixed-feed processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different catalytic activation conditions are applied to different isomer streams. The isopentane-enriched stream undergoes activation at specific temperature and pressure conditions optimized for its molecular structure, while the n-pentane-enriched stream is processed at different optimized conditions. This local optimization of processing parameters for each isomer type maximizes product yield and selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If isopentane and n-pentane are processed together in a single unit, then the device complexity is low, but the yield of olefins and aromatics is not maximized due to different optimal processing conditions for each isomer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of olefins and aromaticsVSAvoidnumber of separation and processing units
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single processing unit is divided into multiple specialized units: a separation unit that divides the feedstock into isopentane-enriched and n-pentane-enriched streams, followed by separate catalytic activation units for each stream. This segmentation enables each unit to operate at optimal conditions for its specific feed composition, maximizing overall yield of olefins and aromatics despite the increased number of units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process utilizes different temperature and pressure parameters for processing different isomer streams. By changing these operating parameters according to the specific isomer composition of each stream, the process maximizes the yield of valuable products. The separation step enables these parameter changes to be applied independently to each stream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If pentane-rich streams are converted to liquid transportation fuels, then the value of the products is increased, but the process must minimize production of C1-C4 light paraffins which are undesirable byproducts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiency to fuel productsVSAvoidformation of C1-C4 light paraffins
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the pentane feedstock into isopentane-enriched and n-pentane-enriched streams before processing, the system can optimize catalytic activation conditions for each isomer type. This segmentation ensures maximum conversion efficiency to valuable fuel products (C6+) while minimizing the formation of unwanted C1-C4 light paraffins, as each stream is processed under conditions specifically optimized for its composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process applies locally optimized catalytic activation conditions to each isomer stream. The isopentane-enriched stream is processed at conditions optimized for isopentane conversion, while the n-pentane-enriched stream is processed at conditions optimized for n-pentane conversion. This local optimization maximizes fuel product yield and minimizes C1-C4 paraffin formation for each stream independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the yield of valuable products like olefins and aromatics, reduces the formation of undesirable C1-C4 light paraffins, and allows for the conversion of pentane-rich streams into suitable liquid transportation fuels, addressing the limitations of existing processes.

Implementation Method 1

at least partially separating various constituents in the hydrocarbon feed stream according to each constituent's characteristic vapor pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor pressure difference: Vapour Pressure

Implementation Method 2

contacting the first fraction with a first activation catalyst at conditions comprising a first temperature and first pressure that facilitate conversion of at least a portion of the first fraction by the first activation catalyst to a first effluent comprising olefins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic cracking: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

contacting at least a portion of the second fraction with a second activation catalyst at a second temperature and second pressure that facilitate conversion of at least a portion of the second fraction by the second catalyst to produce a first effluent comprising olefins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic activation: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

at least a portion of the mixed effluent is contacted with an oligomerization catalyst at conditions of temperature and pressure that facilitate the conversion of the mixed effluent to produce an oligomerization effluent that comprises an increased wt. % of aliphatic hydrocarbons containing from six to nine carbon atoms

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOligomerization: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS10745328B2Catalytic activation and oligomerization of isopentane-enriched mixtures
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 PHILLIPS 66 CO
  • US10745328B2 patent drawing
  • US10745328B2 patent drawing
  • US10745328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates generally to processes and systems for producing liquid transportation fuels by converting a feed stream that comprises both isopentane and n-pentane, and optionally, some C6+ hydrocarbons. Isopentane and smaller hydrocarbons are separated to form a first fraction while n-pentane and larger components of the feed stock form a second fraction. Each fraction is then catalytically-activated in a separate reaction zone with a separate catalyst, where the conditions maintained in each zone maximize the conversion of each fraction to olefins and aromatics, while minimizing the production of C1-C4 light paraffins. In certain embodiments, the first fraction is activated at a lower temperature than the second fraction. Certain embodiments additionally comprise mixing at least a portion of the two effluents and contacting with an oligomerization catalyst to provide enhanced yields of aliphatic hydrocarbons that possess the characteristics of a blend component of a liquid transportation fuel or other value-added chemical products.