Isoxazoline Crystallization for Large Particle Size Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods do not effectively control the particle size of isoxazoline compound crystals, leading to inconsistent quality and performance in pharmaceutical applications.

Innovation Solution

A process involving controlled crystallization techniques, including temperature management, seed addition, and solvent recycling, to produce isoxazoline compound particles with defined dimensions and mechanical resilience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional crystallization is used without control, then the process is simple, but the particle size cannot be controlled and bioavailability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size controlVSAvoidcrystallization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically controlling temperature, supersaturation level, and cooling rate during crystallization. By adjusting these parameters, the process achieves precise control over particle size (75-120 μm) while maintaining a manageable process complexity through defined operational ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring supersaturation levels and adjusting cooling rates accordingly. The process uses real-time measurement of crystal formation and adjusts operational parameters to maintain target particle size distribution, ensuring consistent bioavailability and efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If fast cooling rate is used, then crystal formation is rapid, but only tiny crystals are formed reducing bioavailability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal formation rateVSAvoidparticle size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action through controlled cooling phases followed by holding periods at specific temperatures. The process cycles between cooling to induce nucleation, holding to allow crystal growth, and re-cooling to achieve target size distribution. This periodic approach produces particles of desired size (75-120 μm) while maintaining efficient production rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses preliminary action by pre-cooling the solution to a temperature below the melting point before initiating crystal growth. This preliminary cooling creates the necessary supersaturation state that enables controlled crystal formation, ensuring particles achieve target size while maintaining rapid overall production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If slow cooling rate is used, then large crystals are formed improving bioavailability, but the process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidcrystallization process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction through periodic action by implementing alternating cooling and holding phases. The process cools rapidly to induce nucleation, then holds at specific temperatures to allow crystal growth to target size, and cycles this pattern. This achieves large particles (75-120 μm) with improved bioavailability while controlling total process time through efficient phasing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting cooling rates and holding temperatures based on real-time crystal growth monitoring. The process transitions from rapid cooling for nucleation to slower cooling for growth, optimizing both particle size and process time through controlled parameter variation rather than constant slow cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If no seed crystals are used, then the process is simpler, but particle size distribution is uncontrolled and efficacy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size distributionVSAvoidcrystallization process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-preparing and adding seed crystals to the solution before initiating the crystallization process. These seed crystals provide a controlled nucleation base that directs subsequent crystal growth to produce uniform particles of target size (75-120 μm). This preliminary step ensures precise particle size distribution and optimal efficacy while adding minimal process complexity through standardized seed addition protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Produces isoxazoline compound particles with desired size distribution and thickness, enhancing bioavailability, efficacy, and safety profiles in pharmaceutical compositions.

Implementation Method 1

When a solid substance (solute) is mixed with a liquid solvent and stirred, the solute dissolves in the solvent to form a solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

When the heated saturated solution is cooled, some of the dissolved solute comes out of the solution and crystals of solute start to form

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Implementation Method 3

Cooling further we obtain a labile solution at point B where spontaneous formation of new crystals, i.e. nucleation, takes place

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSupersaturation: Supersaturation

Data Source

PatentUS12630517B2Process for preparing large size isoxazoline particles
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 INTERVET INC
  • US12630517B2 patent drawing
  • US12630517B2 patent drawing
  • US12630517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved process to produce large isoxazoline compound particles which comprises initiating crystallization and then maintaining the temperature of the crystallization in the metastable region by removing, reheating and recycling a portion of the solvent thereby allowing the existing crystals to grow larger while minimizing the formation of newer smaller crystals.