Issue Replication Graph Matching for Consistent Defect Reproduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional technologies for replicating and resolving defect issues in information processing systems rely on manual processes, leading to delays, inconsistency, and the omission of critical information, as different experts provide varying replication suggestions without a defined template, thus prolonging the resolution process.

Innovation Solution

An issue replication system that assigns metrics to resolution requests, stores them in a graph-like data structure, calculates similarity scores with historical cases, and selects relevant historical cases for replication, using semantic matching to identify key steps and parameters for efficient replication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual processes are used to replicate defect issues, then experts can provide replication suggestions, but the process leads to delays, inconsistency, and omission of critical information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of replicationVSAvoidresolution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a standardized template structure that copies and replicates successful issue reproduction patterns from historical data. The template includes predefined sections for preconditions, steps, parameters, and expected results, allowing consistent replication without manual iteration. This template-based copying approach ensures all critical information is captured uniformly across different replication efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts and optimizes replication parameters by analyzing historical resolution data. It identifies which parameters are critical for replication success and automatically sets appropriate values, reducing manual intervention and ensuring consistent, reliable replication results while accelerating the resolution process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If different experts provide replication suggestions without a defined template, then diverse perspectives are brought to the issue, but inconsistency and omission of critical information occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in replication approachVSAvoidcritical information omission
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The template structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides a universal framework for all replication efforts, enforces inclusion of critical information through mandatory fields, and maintains flexibility by allowing customization within predefined sections. This multi-functional design ensures consistent information capture while adapting to different issue types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The replication template is segmented into distinct sections (preconditions, steps, parameters, expected results), each serving a specific purpose. This segmentation ensures that all critical information categories are systematically captured while maintaining flexibility within each section. The structured breakdown prevents information omission while allowing expert customization where appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If manual iteration is used to replicate issues, then experts can identify replication steps, but the process is time-consuming and lacks efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue replication speedVSAvoidmanual iteration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical data to pre-identify replication steps, parameters, and potential issues before the actual replication begins. By preparing the template structure and pre-filling common fields based on historical patterns, the system eliminates time-consuming manual iteration and accelerates the replication process while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12554564B2Smart case scenario design mechanism for reproducing customer issues
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 DELL PROD LP
  • US12554564B2 patent drawing
  • US12554564B2 patent drawing
  • US12554564B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, system, and non-transitory processor-readable storage medium for an issue replication system are provided herein. An example method includes receiving, by an issue replication system, a resolution request from an issue resolution system, where the resolution request is associated with an issue occurring on an information system. The issue replication system assigns at least one metric to the resolution request, and stores the metric in a graph-like data structure. The issue replication system calculates a similarity score between the graph-like data structure and each of a plurality of graph-like data structures from a resolution repository.