Issuer Authorization Vulnerability Testing With Synthetic Fraud Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for determining vulnerabilities in issuer authorization networks require manual setup and testing, lack intelligent test cases, and face challenges with high cardinality categorical columns, leading to privacy concerns and inefficiencies in data processing.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a memory-efficient conditional generative adversarial network (MeTGAN) to generate synthetic transaction data, enrich it with historical card velocity features, and simulate an issuer authorization model to assess vulnerabilities automatically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual testing methods are used to evaluate vulnerabilities in issuer authorization networks, then detailed vulnerability reports can be generated, but the process requires significant manual effort and network downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection accuracyVSAvoidnetwork downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simulated authorization model that replicates the behavior of the actual issuer authorization network. This copy allows vulnerability testing to be performed on the simulation rather than the live system, eliminating network downtime while maintaining detection accuracy. The simulated model mirrors the authorization logic and can be independently tested without affecting production operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs vulnerability assessment in advance by generating synthetic transaction data and testing against the simulated authorization model before deploying changes to the live system. This preliminary testing identifies potential vulnerabilities ahead of time, allowing the actual authorization network to remain operational without interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If synthetic transaction data is generated using existing GAN models, then data privacy concerns are addressed and training data availability is improved, but memory footprint increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata privacy protectionVSAvoidmemory footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and utilizes only the essential characteristics and patterns from real fraudulent transaction data to generate synthetic data. By focusing on key features rather than complete data replication, the system maintains privacy protection while reducing the memory resources required for data storage and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms real transaction data into synthetic data by changing specific parameters and characteristics while preserving the underlying fraud patterns. This parameter transformation approach maintains the reliability of privacy protection through synthetic data generation while optimizing memory usage by not storing both original and complete synthetic datasets simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive transaction data is processed to create test cases, then vulnerability detection coverage is improved, but data processing complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection coverageVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vulnerability assessment process into distinct components: synthetic data generation, enrichment with historical features, feasibility classification, and simulated model testing. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and processed in manageable stages, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage through systematic progression through each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12536542B2Methods and systems for evaluating vulnerability risks of issuer authorization system
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US12536542B2 patent drawing
  • US12536542B2 patent drawing
  • US12536542B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide artificial intelligence methods and systems for evaluating vulnerability risks of issuer authorization system. Method performed by a server system includes accessing a set of payment transaction data including subset of fraudulent transaction data. Method includes generating via a machine learning model, set of synthetic transaction data based on the subset of fraudulent transaction data. Method includes accessing set of historical card velocity features and collating the set of synthetic transaction data and the set of historical card velocity features to generate set of enriched synthetic transaction data. Method includes extracting via a classifier, subset of feasible fraudulent transaction data from the set of enriched synthetic transaction data. Method includes generating simulated authorization model based on the set of payment transaction data. Method includes classifying via simulated authorization model, each enriched synthetic transaction from the subset of feasible fraudulent transaction data as one of fraudulent transaction and non-fraudulent transaction.