Automated IT Infrastructure Management via Controller Templates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IT systems face challenges in diagnosing and addressing performance and security issues, due to inadequate documentation and history of configuration changes, leading to difficulties in troubleshooting and maintaining scalable and secure infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

An automated IT system management approach using a controller that manages computer systems based on system rules, templates, and system state, allowing for automated setup, configuration, maintenance, testing, change management, and upgrade of IT infrastructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual configuration and management of IT systems is performed, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but human error increases and security risks arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem securityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated configuration management where the controller automatically detects system state, applies appropriate templates, and enforces security policies without human intervention. The automated infrastructure management system monitors itself and performs self-healing operations, reducing human error while maintaining system flexibility through programmable rules and templates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring system state and comparing it against desired configurations stored in templates. The controller receives feedback from system components, analyzes deviations, and automatically applies corrective actions. This closed-loop feedback system ensures security compliance while maintaining adaptability through dynamic adjustment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If comprehensive documentation of configuration changes is maintained manually, then system history is preserved, but time and resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration historyVSAvoiddocumentation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates automated copies of configuration states at different points in time through version control mechanisms. Each configuration change is automatically replicated and stored as a historical record, eliminating the need for manual documentation. The controller maintains multiple copies of system state information, enabling rapid retrieval and analysis of configuration history without consuming human time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system performs self-documentation by automatically recording all configuration changes, decisions, and system state transitions. The controller generates comprehensive audit trails and configuration histories autonomously, eliminating the time-consuming manual documentation process while preserving complete system evolution records for future reference and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If frequent updates and patches are applied to address security breaches, then security is improved, but system downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity postureVSAvoidsystem availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-testing security patches and updates in isolated environments before deploying them to production systems. The controller validates update compatibility and security effectiveness in advance, allowing rapid deployment without causing downtime. This preliminary validation ensures security improvements are applied smoothly while maintaining system availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic update management by applying security patches selectively and progressively based on real-time system state analysis. The controller can dynamically adjust update deployment strategies, applying critical security fixes immediately while scheduling non-critical updates during low-impact periods. This dynamic approach maintains security posture while minimizing disruption to system productivity and availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250181415A1Automated Infrastructure Management for Computer Systems Based on System Rules, Templates, and System State with Deployment of Computing Environments
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 NET THUNDER LLC
  • US20250181415A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181415A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181415A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are systems, methods, and apparatuses where a controller can automatically manage a physical infrastructure of a computer system based on a plurality of system rules, a system state for the computer system, and a plurality of templates. Techniques for automatically adding resources such as computer, storage, and/or networking resources to the computer system are described. Also described are techniques for automatically deploying applications and services on such resources. Also described are techniques for spawning computing environments. These techniques provide a scalable computer system that can serve as a turnkey scalable private cloud.