IT Room Cooling Performance Assessment Using Capture Indices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IT-room-design systems fail to provide an accurate and easily comprehensible assessment of cooling performance, requiring extensive training and expertise, and often rely solely on temperature values without considering capture indices like CACI and HACI, leading to inaccurate efficacy determinations.

Innovation Solution

An IT-room-design system that includes a processor configured to receive information-technology-device information, determine containment types, select relevant capture-index information, and calculate cooling-performance assessments based on temperature and capture indices, displaying the results in a graphical user interface with simulated airflow or temperature gradients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If cooling-performance assessment relies solely on temperature values, then the assessment method is simple, but the accuracy of cooling efficacy determination is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling-performance assessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple assessment parameters (temperature values, CACI, HACI, and containment type) into a unified cooling-performance assessment system. This merging of parameters enables comprehensive evaluation of cooling efficacy while maintaining systematic processing through structured workflows that integrate diverse data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The assessment system is designed to handle multiple containment types (contained, partially contained, uncontained) and selectively apply different capture indices based on the containment configuration. This multi-functional capability allows the same system to accurately assess diverse cooling scenarios without requiring separate assessment methods for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If the system considers multiple parameters (temperature, CACI, HACI, containment type), then the assessment accuracy improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling-performance assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of containment type based on device location information before selecting which capture indices to apply. This preliminary classification simplifies subsequent processing by pre-establishing the assessment framework appropriate for each containment scenario, reducing the operational burden during actual assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The assessment process is segmented into distinct stages: determining containment type, selecting applicable capture indices, and calculating cooling-performance assessment. This segmentation breaks down the complex multi-parameter assessment into manageable steps, improving ease of operation while maintaining comprehensive evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of information

If the system provides detailed cooling-performance assessment for each device, then the information completeness improves, but the difficulty of interpretation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling-assessment information completenessVSAvoidassessment result interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses color-coded indicators to represent different levels of cooling performance for each IT device. This visual encoding transforms complex multi-parameter assessment data into immediately interpretable visual signals, allowing users to quickly grasp cooling efficacy without analyzing raw numerical data from multiple parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates visual representations (indicators) that copy and represent the underlying cooling-performance data in an accessible format. These visual indicators serve as simplified copies of the complex assessment results, preserving the essential information while eliminating the interpretive complexity of raw multi-parameter data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11997833B2IT-room-cooling-performance assessment
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IT CORP
  • US11997833B2 patent drawing
  • US11997833B2 patent drawing
  • US11997833B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to at least one aspect of the present disclosure, an information-technology-design system is provided comprising at least one processor coupled to at least one memory, wherein the at least one processor is configured to receive information-technology-device information indicative of a plurality of information-technology devices in a space, the information-technology-device information including information-technology-device-location information, temperature information, and capture-index information, determine, based on the information-technology-device information, a containment type of the plurality of information-technology devices, select, based on the containment type, at least a portion of the capture-index information, determine, based on the information-technology-device-location information, the temperature information, and the at least the portion of the capture-index information, a respective cooling-performance assessment for each information-technology device of the plurality of information-technology devices, and display an indicator of the respective cooling-performance assessment for each information-technology device of the plurality of information-technology devices in the space.