IT Service Agreement Fitness Evaluation via Throughput Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating agreements between IT service providers and customers lack efficiency in determining whether agreements are suitable for meeting business process needs, particularly in complex service environments with multiple stakeholders and dynamic requirements.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves obtaining a workflow model comprising atomic processes with throughput distributions, determining an overall throughput distribution, and assessing whether the agreement is fit based on this distribution, allowing for the evaluation of stochastic business processes and the identification of suitable agreements for service management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional evaluation methods are used for IT service agreements, then the evaluation process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of determining agreement suitability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/manual evaluation methods with a computational model that uses throughput distributions and stochastic process analysis. This substitution enables more precise and reliable evaluation of agreement suitability by leveraging mathematical models and automated calculations rather than manual assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces throughput distribution as a key parameter for evaluating business processes. By changing the evaluation parameter from simple static metrics to dynamic throughput distributions, the system achieves higher measurement precision in determining whether agreements are suitable for meeting business process requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If detailed workflow analysis is performed to evaluate agreements, then the reliability of evaluation improves, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis by calculating throughput distributions for individual atomic processes before evaluating the overall business process. This preliminary action breaks down the complex evaluation into manageable steps, improving reliability while managing computational time through systematic decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the business process into atomic processes and evaluates each independently to determine throughput distributions. This segmentation allows for more reliable bottom-up evaluation while reducing the computational burden by handling smaller, independent units rather than analyzing the entire complex process at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If static evaluation methods are used, then the ease of operation is high, but the adaptability to dynamic business requirements is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic requirementsVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic evaluation by using throughput distributions that can capture varying performance characteristics under different conditions. This dynamic approach allows the evaluation method to adapt to changing business requirements and stochastic variations in process performance, moving beyond static threshold-based assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8103535B2Evaluation of fitness for a contractual agreement related to provisioning information technology services
Publication Date: 2012.01.24 SERVICENOW INC
  • US8103535B2 patent drawing
  • US8103535B2 patent drawing
  • US8103535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The exemplary embodiments of the invention provide computer programs, methods, apparatus and systems that describe techniques providing improved evaluation of business processes based on considerations such as throughput and/or parallelization. As a non-limiting example, such techniques may be useful for evaluating agreements between entities, such as service level agreements between a service provider and another entity (e.g., a supplier or customer of the service provider), for example. In one exemplary embodiment of the invention, a method includes: obtaining a workflow model having a plurality of atomic processes, each atomic process having a distribution of throughput; determining an overall distribution of throughput for the workflow model using the distributions of throughput of the atomic processes; and outputting a determination of whether an agreement relating to the workflow model is fit based on the determined overall distribution of throughput.