IT Workflow Rule Similarity Scoring for Migration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in migrating user-customized IT workflow data to upgraded IT management applications, as the customized data may become similar to new model IT workflow data provided with the upgrade, leading to potential functional inferiority due to lack of metadata and optimized functionality in user-customized workflows.

Innovation Solution

A similarity scoring system is developed to compare user-customized IT workflow data with model IT workflow data, determining a similarity score based on rule comparisons using Levenshtein distance and Dice coefficient determiners, allowing users to select model IT workflow data if it exceeds a threshold, thereby ensuring superior functionality and compatibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If users migrate their customized IT workflow data to upgraded IT management applications, then they can use new features and improved functionality, but their customized data may become similar to new model IT workflow data, resulting in loss of unique functionality and metadata

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with upgraded applicationVSAvoidloss of unique metadata and functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the IT workflow data into multiple components including rules, metadata, and configuration parameters. By dividing the data structure into distinct segments, the system can selectively preserve unique metadata while adopting compatible rule structures from model workflows, thus maintaining both compatibility and uniqueness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different parts of the workflow data to have different levels of customization. Critical metadata and unique functionality are preserved in specific segments while other segments are standardized to match model workflows, ensuring that unique value is retained where needed while achieving compatibility elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If users retain their customized IT workflow data, then they maintain unique functionality and metadata, but they may miss out on superior functionality and optimized performance of new model IT workflows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional reliability of customized workflowVSAvoidaccess to new optimized functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic approach where the system can switch between customized workflow data and model workflow data based on configuration choices. Users can dynamically select which workflow version to use, allowing them to optimize for either reliability of customized processes or access to new features as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a copy mechanism where users can maintain their customized workflow data as a separate copy while also having access to model workflow data. This allows users to preserve their reliable customized workflows while copying selective elements from model workflows when desired, without losing either version.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If users adopt new model IT workflow data in upgraded applications, then they gain superior functionality and metadata, but they risk losing compatibility with existing customized processes and configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional efficiency of model workflowVSAvoidcompatibility with existing customized data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the workflow data structure with universal elements that can function in both customized and model contexts. The rule structures are designed to be multi-functional, allowing them to operate effectively whether derived from user customization or model workflows, thus achieving both productivity improvement and compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer in the data migration process that mediates between customized and model workflow data. This intermediary structure translates and reconciles differences between the two formats, allowing users to adopt model workflows while maintaining compatibility with existing customized processes through the mediating translation layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If users perform manual migration of customized IT workflow data, then they can maintain control over the process, but it requires significant time and effort to ensure data integrity and compatibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control over migration processVSAvoidtime required for manual migration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by automatically preparing and validating workflow data before migration. The system pre-processes customized data to identify compatibility issues, pre-generates migration mappings, and pre-validates data integrity, thereby reducing the time and effort required during the actual migration execution while maintaining user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service automation where the migration system automatically performs data transformation, validation, and compatibility checking without requiring extensive manual intervention. Users initiate the process and review results, but the system autonomously handles the complex migration tasks, significantly reducing manual time investment while preserving user oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11853761B2Similarity scores of rules in information technology workflows
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 MICRO FOCUS LLC
  • US11853761B2 patent drawing
  • US11853761B2 patent drawing
  • US11853761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, first segment of computer language text in a first rule in IT workflow data and a second segment of computer language text in a second rule in the IT workflow data may be identified. In some examples, a similarity score may be determined between the first and the second rules based on a comparison of the first segment with the second segment.