ML-Guided Item Findability Scoring for Warehouse Picking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Items that are difficult to find in warehouses, such as grocery stores, lead to increased time spent by shoppers and pickers, resulting in lost sales and user dissatisfaction, and can cause online systems to miss out on gross transaction value due to incorrectly determining items as out of stock.

Innovation Solution

A trained machine-learning model is used to predict the findability of items, generating findability scores to enhance item location and facilitate efficient picking by providing action signals for pickers and users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual item searching is used in warehouses, then pickers can locate items, but time consumption increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to locate itemsVSAvoidpicking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical searching with an automated machine-learning-based prediction system that predicts item locations and send alerts to pickers, eliminating the need for manual scanning and searching while significantly reducing time consumption and improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine-learning prediction model as an intermediary between the inventory system and pickers, which processes item data, predicts findability scores, and generates alerts to optimize the item location process without requiring pickers to manually search

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If automated systems are used to track items, then item location accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem location accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses machine-learning models to process and transform various input parameters (item data, location information, historical patterns) into meaningful findability predictions, achieving high measurement precision through sophisticated parameter transformation rather than complex hardware systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the physical warehouse environment through data modeling and machine-learning predictions, allowing the system to simulate and predict item locations without requiring complex physical tracking infrastructure throughout the entire warehouse

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If pickers search for items manually, then they can find items, but labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem findabilityVSAvoidlabor resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to serve itself by automatically predicting item locations and generating alerts without requiring continuous human intervention, allowing pickers to receive automated guidance rather than manually searching, thereby reducing labor resource consumption while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual labor with an automated machine-learning system that predicts item locations and communicates with pickers through alerts and notifications, significantly reducing the quantity of labor resources needed while maintaining or improving item findability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If items are marked as out of stock incorrectly, then order fulfillment is simplified, but gross transaction value is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment speedVSAvoidgross transaction value
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the machine-learning model continuously learns from actual item location data and picker feedback to improve its predictions, reducing false out-of-stock markings and ensuring that items are only marked as unavailable when truly out of stock, thereby preventing loss of gross transaction value while maintaining order fulfillment efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260010939A1Using a Trained Machine-Learning Model to Facilitate Picking Items in a Warehouse
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US20260010939A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010939A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010939A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An online system uses a trained machine-learning model to predict hard-to-find items, which may facilitate picking of these items. The online system receives, from one or more devices of one or more pickers, a device of a source, one or more devices associated with one or more users, and/or a computing system associated with a physical receptacle utilized by at least one user for shopping in a location of the source, data with information about an item. The online system applies the trained machine-learning model to output, based on the received data, a findability score for the item indicative of a findability of the item. Based on the findability score, the online system generates and communicates one or more action signals to a device of a picker, the device of the source, and/or a device associated with a user prompting one or more actions in relation to the item.