Item Image Selection for Online Shopping Concierge Platforms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online shopping concierge platforms face challenges in efficiently presenting item images to customers, which affects customer interaction and order fulfillment.

Innovation Solution

A method using multiple machine learning models to generate composite scores for different images of an item, selecting the most appropriate image based on these scores, and presenting it to the customer through a graphical user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple machine learning models are used to generate composite scores for image selection, then image selection accuracy and customer engagement are improved, but system complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage selection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image selection process into multiple independent machine learning models, each evaluating specific aspects of item images (e.g., quality, relevance, customer preference). These segmented models generate individual scores that are then aggregated into a composite score, allowing the system to achieve high selection accuracy while maintaining modularity and manageability of system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the outputs of multiple machine learning models into a single composite score for each image. This merging process integrates various evaluation dimensions (image quality, item relevance, customer engagement metrics) into a unified selection criterion, enabling accurate image selection while consolidating the decision-making process into a manageable framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If multiple machine learning models are trained and processed, then image relevance and quality improve, but computational time and processing power increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality assessmentVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent trains multiple machine learning models in advance during an offline phase, allowing them to be ready for deployment. This preliminary action enables the models to quickly evaluate images during online operations without requiring extensive real-time computational resources, thus reducing processing time while maintaining high image quality assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses multiple pre-trained machine learning models that can be deployed in parallel or sequentially. By having these models ready-made and potentially distributed across different computing nodes, the system can process images efficiently without repeatedly training models during operation, significantly reducing computational time while maintaining accurate quality assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If personalized image selection based on customer interactions is implemented, then customer engagement improves, but data processing requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different evaluation criteria and weighting schemes in the composite score calculation based on individual customer interaction patterns and preferences. This local quality approach allows the system to personalize image selection for each customer without requiring a completely separate processing system, achieving adaptability while managing complexity through targeted customization of the existing framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates customer interaction data (clicks, purchases, views) as feedback signals that continuously refine the machine learning models' understanding of customer preferences. This feedback mechanism enables progressive personalization of image selection, improving adaptability over time while using the same core system infrastructure, thus avoiding exponential growth in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250191041A1Selecting Item Images for an Online Shopping Concierge Platform
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US20250191041A1 patent drawing
  • US20250191041A1 patent drawing
  • US20250191041A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An online shopping concierge platform receives data indicating one or more customer interactions associated with a particular item offered by the online shopping concierge platform; identifies a plurality of different and distinct images of the particular item; generates, based at least in part on multiple different and distinct machine learning (ML) models and for each image of the plurality of different and distinct images, a composite score for the image; selects, based at least in part on its respective composite score, an image of the particular item to be presented to the customer; generates data describing a graphical user interface (GUI) comprising a listing of the particular item including the selected image; and communicates to a computing device associated with the customer the data describing the GUI such that the computing device associated with the customer renders and displays the listing.